2017
DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.03743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature

Abstract: Objective: Only a few papers in the literature aimed to evaluate biopsy core lengths. Additionally, studies evaluated the core length with different approaches. We aimed to determine whether prostate cancer (PCa) detection is affected from core lengths according to three different approaches in a large standard cohort and compare our cut-off values with the published cut-offs. Material and methods:We retrospectively analyzed 1,523 initial consecutive transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsies. Bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In two recent retrospective studies of over 2000 biopsies each, the average biopsy length was between 11.3 and 13.3 mm [11,12]. In a study of over 17,000 biopsies the average length was 10.44 ± 2.36 mm [13]. Reis and co-workers found that, among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, those presenting with underestimated Gleason score had a median core length of 11.4 mm while those with no change in Gleason score had a median core length of 13.7 mm [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two recent retrospective studies of over 2000 biopsies each, the average biopsy length was between 11.3 and 13.3 mm [11,12]. In a study of over 17,000 biopsies the average length was 10.44 ± 2.36 mm [13]. Reis and co-workers found that, among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, those presenting with underestimated Gleason score had a median core length of 11.4 mm while those with no change in Gleason score had a median core length of 13.7 mm [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%