Long Vascular Sheaths for Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures in Children

Dmytriw, Adam A; Ha, Winston; Bickford, Suzanne; Bhatia, Kartik; Shroff, Manohar; Dirks, Peter B.; Muthusami, Prakash

doi:10.5469/neuroint.2021.00192

Neurointervention

2021

DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2021.00192

|View full text |Cite

Long Vascular Sheaths for Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures in Children

Adam A Dmytriw¹,

Winston Ha²,

Suzanne Bickford³

et al.

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long vascular sheaths for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures in children.Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures in children <18 years, using long sheaths was undertaken analyzing procedure type, fluoroscopic times, technical success, access site and systemic complications. Twenty-seven consecutive procedures were included over a two-year period. Mean age was 8.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.3) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Transradial Approach for Pediatric Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Surgery: Single‐Center Case Series and Systematic Review

Baig

Neumaier

Hashmi

et al. 2022

SVIN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Recent widespread adoption of a transradial approach in adults has encouraged its use and expansion in children; however, the safety and feasibility of the transradial approach in the latter has not been established. We evaluated these characteristics in our pediatric case series and compared our results with those in the literature. METHODS Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for consecutive patients ≤18 years of age who underwent diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography through the transradial approach. Patient demographics, indications for the procedure, use of ultrasound guidance, arterial size at the access site, intra‐ and postprocedure complications, and outcomes were recorded. For the literature review, systematic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were conducted using keywords with Boolean operators (“radial artery” AND “pediatric”) for studies published in English between January 2000 and September 2021. Continuous variables were reported as means or medians and respective standard deviations and interquartile ranges according to data normality. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies. RESULTS Twenty‐one patients were included in our series (mean age, 16.6±2.23 years, range 9–17 years; male sex, 11 [52.4%]). The transradial approach was used for diagnostic angiography in 15 cases (71.4%) and intervention in 6 (28.6%). Ultrasound guidance was used and a “radial cocktail” (verapamil‐heparin‐nitroglycerin) was given in all cases. Mean radial artery access‐site diameter was 2.2±0.46 mm. Two cases (9.5%) required conversion to femoral access. Two patients (9.5%) suffered reversible vasospasm. No radial artery occlusion or permanent neurologic deficits were recorded. The systematic review showed results similar to ours for vasospasm rates (7% and 9.5%, respectively) and procedural outcomes (93% and 91%, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results and the literature review demonstrate that the transradial approach is a safe and feasible option for pediatric patients. Routine use of ultrasound guidance, selection of appropriately sized catheters, and prophylactic use of vasodilators and antispasmodics can help ensure the success of the procedure and limit common access‐site complications.

show abstract

Transradial Approach for Pediatric Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Surgery: Single‐Center Case Series and Systematic Review

Baig

Neumaier

Hashmi

et al. 2022

SVIN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Fubuki XF Long Sheath guide catheter use in neuroendovascular procedures: Institutional experience in 60 cases

Saei,

Miller,

Pope

et al. 2024

Interv Neuroradiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Endovascular treatment devices require compatible guide catheters to navigate complex vessels and anatomy. The Fubuki XF Long Sheath guide catheter (Fubuki XF) was developed with a 0.090-inch internal diameter with hydrophilic coating, an atraumatic rounded tip, and enhanced trackability and support with gradual shaft transition zones. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of neuroendovascular patients treated using Fubuki XF at our center (July 2022─May 2023). Baseline/procedural characteristics were collected. Outcomes of interest included technical success (procedure completion with Fubuki XF without alternative guide catheter use) and peri-procedural complications. Results This study included 60 patients (43.3% [26/60] female; mean age: 69.6 ± 9.7) presenting with stenosis (45.0% [27/60]), unruptured aneurysms (31.7% [19/60]), ruptured aneurysm (1.7% [1/60]), arteriovenous fistula (5.0% [3/60]), arteriovenous malformation (3.3% [2/60]), chronic subdural hematoma (3.3% [2/60]), stroke/emboli (6.7% [4/60]), vasospasm (1.7% [1/60]), or carotid web (5.0% [1/60]). Fubuki XF was used to deliver endovascular treatment devices for stenting (43.3% [26/60]), flow diversion (23.3% [14/60]), embolization (11.7% [7/60]), coiling (10.0% [6/60]), balloon angioplasty (10.0% [6/60]), and mechanical thrombectomy (1.7% [1/60]). The Fubuki XF tip was placed in the internal carotid artery in 38.3% (23/60) of cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases. One V1 non-flow-limiting dissection (not related to Fubuki XF) and one failed closure occurred (1.7% [1/60] each). No iatrogenic strokes or intraprocedural ruptures occurred. Conclusion We used Fubuki XF to safely and effectively deliver a variety of compatible neuroendovascular devices. Fubuki XF was stable in all cases and locations, and there were no device-related complications or dissections.

show abstract

Head and neck angiography in the pediatric population: single-center experience with indications, safety, feasibility, and technical differences among infants, childhood, and adolescents

Monteiro

Donnelly

Recker

et al. 2023

Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE Pediatric patients are candidates for head and neck endovascular procedures less frequently than adults. Data on utilization, feasibility, safety, and technical details of head and neck angiography in the pediatric population are scarce. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of their center’s endovascular database to identify all patients ≤ 18 years of age who underwent diagnostic or interventional catheter-based angiography of the head and neck. Procedure-related variables for identified patients were compared across infancy (birth to 2 years), childhood (> 2–11 years), and adolescence (> 11–18 years). RESULTS One hundred twenty-one pediatric patients who underwent 274 angiogram procedures were included in this study. Of these angiograms, 197 were diagnostic and 118 were interventional (including 41 of the diagnostic angiogram procedures that were performed concurrently with the intervention). The most common indications for diagnostic angiograms were suspected vascular malformations in 52 cases (26.4%) and aneurysms in 23 (11.7%). The rate of positive findings on diagnostic angiograms ranged from 27.3% to 80% according to the indication. Access site–related complications were observed after 2 punctures (0.7%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 3 patients (1.1%). In adolescents, the rates of general anesthesia use and sheathless access were significantly lower (each p < 0.001), and the rates of radial artery access (p < 0.001); 5-French (5F) (p = 0.01), 6F (p < 0.001), and 8F (p = 0.03) access; and closure device usage (p < 0.001) were significantly higher. In infants, the rates of ultrasound guidance, 4F access, and failure of the primary puncture site were significantly higher (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Head and neck angiograms in the pediatric population were feasible and safe in the authors’ overall experience. Technical differences were observed across the infant, childhood, and adolescent groups, but safe outcomes were similar throughout these age ranges.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Long Vascular Sheaths for Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures in Children

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

Transradial Approach for Pediatric Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Surgery: Single‐Center Case Series and Systematic Review

Transradial Approach for Pediatric Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Surgery: Single‐Center Case Series and Systematic Review

Fubuki XF Long Sheath guide catheter use in neuroendovascular procedures: Institutional experience in 60 cases

Head and neck angiography in the pediatric population: single-center experience with indications, safety, feasibility, and technical differences among infants, childhood, and adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About