2006
DOI: 10.1086/504698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Type I X‐Ray Bursts and Neutron Star Interior Physics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
346
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
26
346
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From our modelling to the combined 2012-2013 data set we find a maximum depth for the shallow heat of log P =27.5 (P ≃3 × 10 27 erg cm −3 ), which corresponds to a column depth of y≃10 13 g cm −2 . This is broadly consistent with expectations from superbursts, which are thought to occur at y≃10 12 g cm −2 and require additional heating to get the temperature sufficiently high to achieve ignition at this depth (e.g., Cumming et al 2006). We note that Aql X-1 is itself not a superburster.…”
Section: Crust Cooling and Shallow Heating In Aql X-1supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From our modelling to the combined 2012-2013 data set we find a maximum depth for the shallow heat of log P =27.5 (P ≃3 × 10 27 erg cm −3 ), which corresponds to a column depth of y≃10 13 g cm −2 . This is broadly consistent with expectations from superbursts, which are thought to occur at y≃10 12 g cm −2 and require additional heating to get the temperature sufficiently high to achieve ignition at this depth (e.g., Cumming et al 2006). We note that Aql X-1 is itself not a superburster.…”
Section: Crust Cooling and Shallow Heating In Aql X-1supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This can be reconciled if there is an additional heat flux coming from the crust. Furthermore, the ignition of carbon that produces superbursts (very rare and energetic, hours-long X-ray bursts) can only be achieved if the crust temperature is considerably higher than accounted for by nuclear heating (e.g., Cumming et al 2006;Keek et al 2008;Altamirano et al 2012). Finally, the cessation of X-ray bursts as the mass-accretion rate increases seems to occur much more rapidly than can be accounted for by nuclear heating, and may also require additional energy release at shallow depth (in 't Zand et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the GBM bursts in 2S0918-549 (t rec = 56 ± 12 day; á ñ E = 6 × 10 39 erg) are more energetic and less frequent than those from 4U0614+09 (t rec = 17 ± 2 day; á ñ E = 2 × 10 39 erg). This is qualitatively explained by ignition models, given that 2S0918-549 accretes at a rate about half that of 4U0614+09 (Cumming et al 2006). Lower ṁ implies a colder neutron star envelope, a longer fuel accumulation time, and a greater ignition depth.…”
Section: Other Bursters and The Integrated Galactic Txrb Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, at the lowest ṁ (near or below 1% of the Eddington limit) the heat flux from the NS crust can critically influence the ignition conditions for tXRBs. Thus we can potentially use low-ṁ tXRBs to constrain the internal properties of NSs (Cumming et al 2006). However, because recurrence times of low-ṁ tXRBS are of the order of weeks to months, they are extremely difficult to measure with pointed or scanning X-ray detectors.…”
Section: The Rare and Most Energetic Thermonuclear Burstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider reactions of each type (each line in Table I) separately, and apply the analytic model (13) and (20) to every reaction. In this manner we determine 3 fit parameters, E C , δ and j 0 , for every reaction.…”
Section: Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%