2001
DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.3.940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Ventilation for Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the healthcare workers consistently underestimated the quality of life of DMD patients. Unfortunately, information on the impact of NIV in DMD does not yet seem to have filtered through to all centres who manage such patients, some of whom do not discuss the option of mechanical ventilation with patients because of a misperception that it results in a poor quality of life [28].…”
Section: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the healthcare workers consistently underestimated the quality of life of DMD patients. Unfortunately, information on the impact of NIV in DMD does not yet seem to have filtered through to all centres who manage such patients, some of whom do not discuss the option of mechanical ventilation with patients because of a misperception that it results in a poor quality of life [28].…”
Section: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the DMD-FNS during clinic visits, health care professionals may be in a better position to understand each family's unique priority needs and strengths, instead of having to second guess what they might be or be influenced by clinician's personal bias [Gibson, 2001;Kinali et al, 2007]. The revised DMD-FNS that was used in this study incorporates topics specific to the care of individuals with DMD, and therefore may serve as an ideal prompt for parents to discuss these issues during their child's regular clinic visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset did not include information about quality of life, so increases in age at death do not necessarily equate with improvements in quality of life. 29 Interpretation was complicated by the coding of MDs as a group in the ICD system, and by the lack of age-, race-, and sex-specific prevalence and age at death estimates for MDs. The sample sizes for female and black decedents limited the power of some race-or sex-specific analyses, especially when the need to dichotomize year of death could have masked small gradual changes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%