2010
DOI: 10.1890/es10-00018.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed‐conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada

Abstract: Abstract. Nearly a century of fire suppression has changed fundamental aspects of the structure and functioning of fire-adapted forests throughout the western U.S. Prescribed fire is increasingly used to restore forest structure and reduce surface fuels with limited consideration of its consequences for biological diversity. In this study, we used more than two decades of data from permanent plots in mixedconifer forests of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California, to explore changes in plant divers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
54
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
5
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Live stem biomass declined throughout post-fire observations, although the rate of biomass loss slowed considerably by eight years post-fire. While high severity disturbances can change forests from net carbon accumulators to net carbon emitters for long periods (Cohen et al, 1996;Kashian et al, 2006;Dore et al, 2010), our results imply that low to moderate severity disturbances have milder effects on live biomass, likely stabilizing in a relatively short period of time (likely less than 10 years) (also see Hurteau and North, 2010;Webster and Halpern, 2010). Moreover, reductions in forest density following prescribed fire are expected to decrease risks of crown fires , potentially reducing the likelihood of massive carbon losses from future wildfires North et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Live stem biomass declined throughout post-fire observations, although the rate of biomass loss slowed considerably by eight years post-fire. While high severity disturbances can change forests from net carbon accumulators to net carbon emitters for long periods (Cohen et al, 1996;Kashian et al, 2006;Dore et al, 2010), our results imply that low to moderate severity disturbances have milder effects on live biomass, likely stabilizing in a relatively short period of time (likely less than 10 years) (also see Hurteau and North, 2010;Webster and Halpern, 2010). Moreover, reductions in forest density following prescribed fire are expected to decrease risks of crown fires , potentially reducing the likelihood of massive carbon losses from future wildfires North et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This research effort will require understanding the mechanisms that drive differences in forest response to fire, and will need to consider the effects of climate, typical fire weather, alterations of fuel types and amounts, and physiological and allometric differences among dominant species. It will also become increasingly important to describe differences between first versus second-entry burns as restoration treatments continue at high priority sites (see Webster and Halpern, 2010). A mechanistic understanding of fire effects is critical, especially as climatic conditions change in ways that may preclude comparatively simple restoration prescriptions (Millar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major changes to fire regimes, tree structure and composition, forest floor and light conditions, climate, and introduction of livestock and exotic species may all influence understory vegetation (Battaglia and Shepperd, 2007;Knapp et al, 2013). Except for rare forests such as those with natural fire regimes continued through the 1900s (mostly in Mexico; Minnich et al, 2000) or with managed active fire programs (e.g., Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks; Webster and Halpern, 2010), the key evolutionary process of low-and mixed-severity fire has been excluded after settlement (Heinlein et al, 2005;Baker et al, 2007;Falk et al, 2011). Fuel loads accrued during the 1900s support severe, stand-replacing fire regimes in many areas (Freeman et al, 2007;Crotteau et al, 2013;Fornwalt and Kaufmann, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a body of literature documenting the effects of wildfire and prescribed burning on understory abundance or diversity in the absence of cattle grazing , Metlen and Fiedler 2006, Knapp et al 2007, Laughlin and Fulé 2008, Webster and Halpern 2010. Evidence from these studies suggest that understory abundance or diversity can be enhanced by prescribed fire, although some report variable responses (Laughlin et al 2004, Laughlin 2006, Moore et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%