2018
DOI: 10.1134/s0001433818020056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Variability of UV Irradiance in the Moscow Region according to Measurement and Modeling Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for total ozone and cloud variations we applied the same method to the different datasets (INM-RSHU CCM, ERA-Interim reanalysis, satellite TOMS/OMI). We should note, that in this study we do not take into account changes in aerosol optical properties and surface reflectivity, which could have some direct and indirect radiative effect on variations in Eery, but at much smaller level comparing with ozone and cloudiness over the 1979-2015 period [28].…”
Section: Methods and The Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To account for total ozone and cloud variations we applied the same method to the different datasets (INM-RSHU CCM, ERA-Interim reanalysis, satellite TOMS/OMI). We should note, that in this study we do not take into account changes in aerosol optical properties and surface reflectivity, which could have some direct and indirect radiative effect on variations in Eery, but at much smaller level comparing with ozone and cloudiness over the 1979-2015 period [28].…”
Section: Methods and The Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result, we showed that for optically thin cloudiness with CMF > 0.95 we can neglect its spectral dependence, while a correction should be used in other conditions. According to [28], this correction is the following: CMF UV = (0.1417 × sin(h e ) 2 − 0.175 × sin(h e ) + 1.054)CMF (−0.04 × sin(h e ) 2 + 0.554 × sin(h e ) + 0.609)…”
Section: Methods and The Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations