2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term vaccine efficacy of a 2-dose varicella vaccine in China from 2011 to 2021: A retrospective observational study

Abstract: ObjectiveA 2-dose varicella vaccine immunization strategy has been implemented in many cities in China, but there is few evidence on a long-term evaluation of the efficacy of the 2-dose varicella vaccine from China. This study aims to assess the long-term vaccine efficacy of the two doses varicella vaccine and analysis of its influencing factors.MethodsA retrospective study was carried out in 837,144 children born between 2011 and 2017 in Ningbo, Easten China. The logistic regression was performed to estimate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this real-world vaccine effectiveness study, the half dose (single dose) showed a vaccine effectiveness of 56% and the full dose (double dose) varicella vaccination showed an 87% vaccine effectiveness against varicella infection. These results are comparable to the vaccine efficacy ranging from 87% to 95% that has been reported from randomized controlled trials [18,[28][29][30][31][32] and the 84% to 98% reported from real-world studies [2,16,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this real-world vaccine effectiveness study, the half dose (single dose) showed a vaccine effectiveness of 56% and the full dose (double dose) varicella vaccination showed an 87% vaccine effectiveness against varicella infection. These results are comparable to the vaccine efficacy ranging from 87% to 95% that has been reported from randomized controlled trials [18,[28][29][30][31][32] and the 84% to 98% reported from real-world studies [2,16,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results showed that the average coverage rate of the one-dose or first-dose VarV was 96.23% in 2013-2018 birth cohorts and that of a second-dose VarV was 86.06% in 2013-2015 birth cohorts after the introduction of the two-dose VarV program, which is higher than that in other areas of China [28][29][30][31]. The varicella incidence decreased by 45.25% after one year of the two-dose VarV immunization program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is also the cause of breakthrough cases. The Shu study showed that 26 the age at the second vaccination and the interval between two doses affected the VE of 2-dose vaccine, and the shorter the two doses intervals, the better the effect of the vaccine, and could reduce breakthrough varicella and outbreaks in preschool. In other words, the VE of two doses of varicella in vaccine recipients receiving vaccines at <4 years of age was higher than that of vaccine recipients injecting vaccines at ≥4 years of age, whether the interval between the two vaccine doses was >24 months, suggesting that the second dose of varicella could be given as soon as possible when the vaccination interval meets the basic requirements of the interval was more than 3 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%