2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0491-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term use of daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: why hesitate any longer?

Abstract: The aim of this review is to present the scientific rationale for long-term daily subcutaneous LMWH in cancer patients, and to reinforce the favourable benefit/tolerance tolerability ratio with this specific antithrombotic strategy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, LMWHs have received widespread acceptance as the anticoagulant of choice not only for short-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (Bai & Ahsan, 2010) but also for prolonged duration thromboprophylaxis in certain pathologic conditions, such as cancer (Schulman, 2003;Kher & Samama, 2005;Debourdeau et al, 2008;Walter et al, 2014). Moreover, LMWHs have been used for maintenance of vessel patency during hemodialysis and artery bypass grafting (Patel et al, 2009), prevention of acute bronchoconstrictor responses and airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma (Campo et al, 1999;Ahmed et al, 2000) and regulation of growth factor activity in various vascular disorders and angiogenesis (Reyes-Ortega et al, 2013).…”
Section: Lmwhs: Chemistry and Pharmacological Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, LMWHs have received widespread acceptance as the anticoagulant of choice not only for short-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (Bai & Ahsan, 2010) but also for prolonged duration thromboprophylaxis in certain pathologic conditions, such as cancer (Schulman, 2003;Kher & Samama, 2005;Debourdeau et al, 2008;Walter et al, 2014). Moreover, LMWHs have been used for maintenance of vessel patency during hemodialysis and artery bypass grafting (Patel et al, 2009), prevention of acute bronchoconstrictor responses and airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma (Campo et al, 1999;Ahmed et al, 2000) and regulation of growth factor activity in various vascular disorders and angiogenesis (Reyes-Ortega et al, 2013).…”
Section: Lmwhs: Chemistry and Pharmacological Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians may avoid the long-term use of LMWH in patients with cancer due to presumed intolerance and low patient acceptance of subcutaneous injections 56. Many oncologists do not prescribe LMWH for 3 or 6 months to avoid additional treatment burden for patients,20 but such concerns may not be valid (Table 3).…”
Section: Venous Thromboembolism Treatment In Patients With Cancer: Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many oncologists do not prescribe LMWH for 3 or 6 months to avoid additional treatment burden for patients,20 but such concerns may not be valid (Table 3). 56 It has been demonstrated that, similar to patients with diabetes, cancer patients can cope with the injections as long as they understand their benefits 57…”
Section: Venous Thromboembolism Treatment In Patients With Cancer: Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations