2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2003.tb03300.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term treatment with dalteparin low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may improve survival in patients with non-metastatic malignancy and venous thromboembolism (VTE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Long-term treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as with VKAs 27 but is not preferred by most patients as daily injections are needed. In patients with cancer, treatment with LMWH offers several practical advantages (including that there are no interactions, coagulation monitoring is not required, and bridging therapy is not needed in the event of invasive procedures) and appears to have a survival benefit in a subset of these patients, 28 and so is recommended for the first 3 to 6 months of secondary prophylaxis. 26 There is a tendency to continue prophylaxis for longer after a first episode of unprovoked VTE as the risk of recurrence is still present many years after the initial event.…”
Section: Case 2: Treatment Of Deep Vein Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Long-term treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as with VKAs 27 but is not preferred by most patients as daily injections are needed. In patients with cancer, treatment with LMWH offers several practical advantages (including that there are no interactions, coagulation monitoring is not required, and bridging therapy is not needed in the event of invasive procedures) and appears to have a survival benefit in a subset of these patients, 28 and so is recommended for the first 3 to 6 months of secondary prophylaxis. 26 There is a tendency to continue prophylaxis for longer after a first episode of unprovoked VTE as the risk of recurrence is still present many years after the initial event.…”
Section: Case 2: Treatment Of Deep Vein Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent randomized trials of low-molecularweight heparins in cancer patients suggest that there may still be a potential role for anticoagulation in improving the survival of cancer patients. [23][24][25][26] In addition, newly developed oral factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors may provide a safer and more convenient approach to the use of anticoagulation in cancer patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No difference was observed between treatment groups in the patients with metastatic cancer. In the subgroup of 150 patients with non‐metastatic solid tumors at randomization, over the 12‐month follow‐up period, the cumulative mortality in the dalteparin and warfarin groups was 20% and 35%, respectively ( P = 0.03) [53]. These findings suggest that long‐term dalteparin treatment rather than oral VKA treatment may extend survival in cancer patients with non‐metastatic disease and acute VTE.…”
Section: The Effects Of Heparins and Vka On Survival In Patients Withmentioning
confidence: 99%