1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90309-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term tolerability of fenretinide (4-HPR) in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 Briefly, eligible patients were <75 years old; operated on for a previously untreated homogeneous or nonhomogeneous oral leukoplakia, with postoperative histology that did not include in situ, miniinvasive or invasive carcinoma; with normal white cell, erythrocyte and platelet counts; and metabolic, renal and liver function tests within 1.5 times upper normal limits. 22,23 Patients were randomized to either no treatment or 4-HPR orally at a dose of 200 mg/day (2 capsules of 100 mg) for 1 year. To allocate a patient, the investigator called the data manager at the Milan coordinating center, who checked inclusion and exclusion criteria and allocated to one of the groups using a randomization list stratified by center.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Briefly, eligible patients were <75 years old; operated on for a previously untreated homogeneous or nonhomogeneous oral leukoplakia, with postoperative histology that did not include in situ, miniinvasive or invasive carcinoma; with normal white cell, erythrocyte and platelet counts; and metabolic, renal and liver function tests within 1.5 times upper normal limits. 22,23 Patients were randomized to either no treatment or 4-HPR orally at a dose of 200 mg/day (2 capsules of 100 mg) for 1 year. To allocate a patient, the investigator called the data manager at the Milan coordinating center, who checked inclusion and exclusion criteria and allocated to one of the groups using a randomization list stratified by center.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosage of 4-HPR used in this study was 300 mglday, which is higher than the 200 mglday dosage used in breast cancer prophylaxis studies (24). Although drug levels were not measured in plasma, one can infer, based on the observed toxicity profile in this study, i.e., decreased nocturnal visual acuity, that drug levels were sufficient to achieve a biological effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…14,15 Our study focused on a novel vitamin A derivative that induces apoptosis in a wide variety of malignant cell lines and has been shown to be well tolerated for long durations in large clinical trials. 6,7,[16][17][18][19][20] Previous pilot studies from our group For personal use only. on May 12, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From demonstrated that 4HPR is superior to other retinoids in inducing growth arrest and apoptosis in human Burkitt lymphoma cell lines in vitro and that it can augment the apoptotic action of anti-CD20 antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fenretinide affords a potentially less toxic approach to enhance rituximab's efficacy because it has been found to be well tolerated in a large number of chemopreventive and therapeutic trials. [16][17][18][19][20][34][35][36] Studies using fenretinide doses of up to 400 mg/d orally with a 3-day drug holiday each month demonstrated very low rates (less than 10%) of all toxicities. 17,34,35,37 Such an approach parallels the 2-day-a-week drug holiday that the experimental animals in our study enjoyed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%