2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12861-016-0104-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term time-lapse live imaging reveals extensive cell migration during annelid regeneration

Abstract: BackgroundTime-lapse imaging has proven highly valuable for studying development, yielding data of much finer resolution than traditional “still-shot” studies and allowing direct examination of tissue and cell dynamics. A major challenge for time-lapse imaging of animals is keeping specimens immobile yet healthy for extended periods of time. Although this is often feasible for embryos, the difficulty of immobilizing typically motile juvenile and adult stages remains a persistent obstacle to time-lapse imaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, EdU incorporation only labels cells that are undergoing DNA synthesis at the time of exposure, and thus the 1 h pulses used in these experiments will probably only label a subset of a larger population of actively dividing cells. In addition, it is also possible that non‐dividing cells (e.g., differentiated cell types) also migrate, as reported in previous studies (see Bely, ), including in a live imaging study in Pristina leidyi (Zattara et al., ). These non‐proliferating migrating cells could then undergo a dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation step when they reach their final destination, or be part of an early immune response to the wound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, EdU incorporation only labels cells that are undergoing DNA synthesis at the time of exposure, and thus the 1 h pulses used in these experiments will probably only label a subset of a larger population of actively dividing cells. In addition, it is also possible that non‐dividing cells (e.g., differentiated cell types) also migrate, as reported in previous studies (see Bely, ), including in a live imaging study in Pristina leidyi (Zattara et al., ). These non‐proliferating migrating cells could then undergo a dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation step when they reach their final destination, or be part of an early immune response to the wound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Some of these migrating cells are thought to mediate an immune response, although one population known as neoblasts (Randolph, , ), have been classified as a putative stem cell population. To date, cells that closely fit the description of neoblasts have been described mostly in clitellates, but also in some polychaetes (Bilello & Potswald, ; Cornec, Cresp, Delye, Hoarau, & Reynaud, ; Faulkner, , ; Krecker, ; Probst, ; Randolph, , ; Stephan‐Dubois, ; Stolte, ; Sugio et al., ; Tadokoro, Sugio, Kutsuna, Tochinai, & Takahashi, ; Zattara, Turlington, & Bely, ). Regeneration abilities are not limited to species with neoblasts; annelids that lack cells with obvious neoblast characteristics can regenerate (Herlant‐Meewis, ; Krecker, ; Myohara, ; Stone, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of these species belong to one of the two main clades of the phylum Annelida, the Sedentaria (Struck et al, 2011). In these species, indirect evidence for an involvement of neoblast-like resident stem cells during regeneration, such as the presence in non-injured animals of cells that express homologues of genes known to be expressed in flatworm neoblasts and the observation of long distance migration of cells towards the amputation site, have been obtained (e.g., Bely, 2014;de Jong and Seaver, 2017;Myohara, 2012;Özpolat and Bely, 2016;Zattara et al, 2016). In the other main annelid group, the Errantia, the presence of neoblast-like cells is much more elusive and there are in contrast experimental evidence indicating that regenerated structures only originate from cells located close to the amputation site, probably through dedifferentiation events (e.g., Boilly, 1965a,b;Boilly, 1968a,b;Boilly, 1969a,b,c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%