2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term testing of Microbial Fuel Cells: Comparison of different anode materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the maximum current density attainable increases over time reaching a value as high as 35 A m ‐2 , which is a very remarkable value for this type of MFCs taking into account the absence of catalyst on the anode, which accelerates the electron transfer. This is clearly seen when it is compared with the 0.8 A m ‐2 obtained in a MFC with a carbon felt anode of 25 cm 2 , a carbonaceous cathode with 0.5 mg Pt cm ‐2 and enriched with mixed culture; the 20 A m ‐2 reached in a double chamber MFC using anode and cathode of carbon felt under the same operational conditions as our study, and the 4.65 A m ‐2 and 0.75 A m ‐2 attained in another double chamber devices of 0.0113 cm 2 of carbon felt anode , . Other studies in literature with a different material in the anode reflected lower achievable current densities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, the maximum current density attainable increases over time reaching a value as high as 35 A m ‐2 , which is a very remarkable value for this type of MFCs taking into account the absence of catalyst on the anode, which accelerates the electron transfer. This is clearly seen when it is compared with the 0.8 A m ‐2 obtained in a MFC with a carbon felt anode of 25 cm 2 , a carbonaceous cathode with 0.5 mg Pt cm ‐2 and enriched with mixed culture; the 20 A m ‐2 reached in a double chamber MFC using anode and cathode of carbon felt under the same operational conditions as our study, and the 4.65 A m ‐2 and 0.75 A m ‐2 attained in another double chamber devices of 0.0113 cm 2 of carbon felt anode , . Other studies in literature with a different material in the anode reflected lower achievable current densities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Figure shows the main parameters obtained from these curves. In part A, it can be seen how, despite the performance seeming to be stabilized, as the dynamic response of the daily voltage under close circuit conditions indicates, the capacity for the production of power could still be improved after 40 days of operation and how the best MFC (that operated at SRT of 2.5 days) reached 3 W m ‐2 , which is an outstanding value for the technology used, comparable with the output powers of other similar devices in the literature: 1 W m ‐2 , 2 W m ‐2 , 0.1 W m ‐2 , , 0.6 W m ‐2 , . 0.07 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best performing cell during MFC operation, the one inoculated with aerobic sludge under starving condition (MFC_100A.S), recorded an OCV of just 509 mV and the worse operating cells recorded always higher values: 809 mV for MFC_10A.S, 859 mV for MFC_50A.S and 859 mV for MFC_100N.A.S. Fuel mass transfer problems in the deeper layers of microorganisms might be the responsible for the decrease in the OCV of MFC_100A.S while the other MFCs show the theoretical value of OCV when operating with carbon felt as anode[30,31] as no electrogenic microorganisms grew up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beside wastewater MFC can usage clean mixtures such as acetate or butyrate (Hidalgo et al 2016), alcohol, fatty acid, monosaccharide sugar (Asensio et al 2016), sucrose and glucose as electrolyte. To improve the output of MFC, recently researchers did several studies to the practice of MFC through membrane (Ghasemi et al 2015), short of membrane (Logan et al 2007), using moderator, short of moderator (Sevda and Sreekrishnan 2012) also using biocathodes (Gonzalez del Campo et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%