1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01153-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term survival after thoracoscopic lung volume reduction: a multiinstitutional review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2-yr post-LVRS results are in contrast to the progressive deterioration in similar patients accepted for, but denied LVRS by Medicare, and followed for a similar time (4). Prospective long-term studies, beyond 2 yr after LVRS, are very limited (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The 2-yr post-LVRS results are in contrast to the progressive deterioration in similar patients accepted for, but denied LVRS by Medicare, and followed for a similar time (4). Prospective long-term studies, beyond 2 yr after LVRS, are very limited (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, in a multi-institutional study [114] 3-year survival was 69% after unilateral and 74% after bilateral LVRS with no intergroup difference.…”
Section: Unilateral Lvrsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Die perioperative Mortalität wurde abhängig vom Ausmaû der Operation, der Operationstechnik, dem Emphysemtyp und der Patientenselektion mit 3 ± 10 % definiert [87 ± 95, 98]. Nur etwa die Hälfte der operativen Mortalität ist allerdings dem respiratorischen Versagen zuzuordnen [87]. Um eine möglichst geringe peri-und postoperative Mortalität bei LVR zu erreichen, wird eine 6MGS von wenigsten 150 m [96,97] oder 200 m [79] gefordert.…”
Section: Testdurchführung Und Richtwerteunclassified