2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term stability of the French WISC-IV: Standard and CHC index scores

Abstract: Introduction. – L’hypothèse de la stabilité de l’intelligence est à l’origine de la valeur prédictive du Quotient Intellectuel (p.ex. QI Total). Or, peu d’études ont été conduites sur la stabilité à long terme des scores de l’une des batteries les plus utilisées dans le domaine de l’évaluation cognitive : la 4eédition de l’Échelle d’intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants et adolescents (WISC-IV). Objectif. – Afin de favoriser une compréhension approfondie et une meilleure utilisation des scores des tests d’inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We partly controlled for this aspect by using tests that are typically chosen in the literature to evaluate the effects of an intervention. For instance, in a recent study [56] (see Table 3), children performed the French version of the WISC-IV twice, with an average of 20 months between test repetition. The improvement in IQ scores (Full Scale IQ) was significant but smaller (2.5) than in the present study (4.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We partly controlled for this aspect by using tests that are typically chosen in the literature to evaluate the effects of an intervention. For instance, in a recent study [56] (see Table 3), children performed the French version of the WISC-IV twice, with an average of 20 months between test repetition. The improvement in IQ scores (Full Scale IQ) was significant but smaller (2.5) than in the present study (4.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with Spearman (1927) and Carroll's (1993) conceptualizations of g. Given the overwhelming dominance of the general factor, the present results indicated that interpretation of first-order factors is quite limited and problematic given the conflation of general and group factor variance in index scores. Further, some studies have shown that the temporal stability of index scores was not sufficiently high (Kieng, Rossier, Favez, & Lecerf, 2017;Watkins & Smith, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary criteria for evaluating fit were applied with values of Ͼ.95 for CFI and TLI, and Ͻ.06 for RMSEA and Ͻ.08 for SRMR representing good model fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999). The AIC and the BIC were also used to compare models: the smaller AIC suggests the better model most likely to replicate (Kline, 2016). In the French WISC-V Interpretive Manual, ⌬ 2 was the sole criterion used to compare models.…”
Section: Procedures and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations