2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term stability of planets in and around binary stars

Abstract: Planets are observed to orbit the component star(s) of stellar binary systems on so-called circumprimary or circumsecondary orbits, as well as around the entire binary system on so-called circumbinary orbits. Depending on the orbital parameters of the binary system a planet will be dynamically stable if it orbits within some critical separation of the semimajor axis in the circumprimary case, or beyond some critical separation for the circumbinary case. We present N-body simulations of star-forming regions tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note-a) -re-analysis of archival IRAC data; b) -determined applying DUSTY and COND models, respectively; c) -assuming a hot-start (cold-start) formation scenario; d) -minimum masses, m sin i and 44±16%, respectively, which are consistent within wide uncertainties with the comprehensive determinations by Reylé et al (2021) in the 10 pc sample and by Ballantyne et al (2021) for the M dwarfs. For the statistical analysis, we considered the relatively close systems (s 50 au; Sirius, GJ 65, GJ 866, Procyon, GJ 860 and GJ 1245) as individual systems and those having components at wider average orbital separations (s 50 au; GJ 820AB, GJ 725AB and GJ 15AB) as two individual stars.…”
Section: 5-35 Au 90%supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Note-a) -re-analysis of archival IRAC data; b) -determined applying DUSTY and COND models, respectively; c) -assuming a hot-start (cold-start) formation scenario; d) -minimum masses, m sin i and 44±16%, respectively, which are consistent within wide uncertainties with the comprehensive determinations by Reylé et al (2021) in the 10 pc sample and by Ballantyne et al (2021) for the M dwarfs. For the statistical analysis, we considered the relatively close systems (s 50 au; Sirius, GJ 65, GJ 866, Procyon, GJ 860 and GJ 1245) as individual systems and those having components at wider average orbital separations (s 50 au; GJ 820AB, GJ 725AB and GJ 15AB) as two individual stars.…”
Section: 5-35 Au 90%supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Novelties with respect to Danielski et al (2019) are both the different lower bound 𝑎 min for the distribution of the semi-major axis, and the inclusion of the eccentricity as an extra parameter defining the orbit of the third body. The lower bound 𝑎 min is now physically motivated and is provided by the stability criterion of Ballantyne et al (2021) which, assuming a total DWD mass of 2 M separated by 1 R with zero eccentricity, yields 𝑎 min,1 = 2.39 R . These values have been chosen as representatives among the highest possible values within our DWD population, to provide a conservative condition for the minimum value of 𝑎.…”
Section: Tertiary Sub-stellar Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No v elties with respect to Danielski et al ( 2019 ) are both the different lower bound a min for the distribution of the semimajor axis, and the inclusion of the eccentricity as an extra parameter defining the orbit of the third body. The lower bound a min is now physically motivated and is provided by the stability criterion of Ballantyne et al ( 2021 ) which, assuming a total DWD mass of 2 M separated by 1 R with zero eccentricity, yields a min , 1 = 2 . 39 R .…”
Section: Tertiary Substellar Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%