2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0400-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (SEPAT) – guidelines adherence and outcome

Abstract: BackgroundA number of registry studies have reported suboptimal adherence to guidelines for cardiovascular prevention during the first year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, only a few studies have addressed long-term secondary prevention after AMI. This study evaluates prevention guideline adherence and outcome of guideline-directed secondary prevention in patients surviving 2 years after AMI.MethodsPatients aged 18–85 years at the time of their index AMI were consecutively identified from hos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In this context, secondary prevention of CHD, especially using pharmacological therapy, has been effective in reducing recurrence of events, decreasing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life. 3 National and international guidelines recommend long-term use of evidence-based medication for management of CHD, such as use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and statins, as first-line therapy; or other antiplatelet medication, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or fibrate when first-line therapy is contraindicated. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite this well-established knowledge, not all patients with CHD are able to obtain the standard treatment endorsed by the guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In this context, secondary prevention of CHD, especially using pharmacological therapy, has been effective in reducing recurrence of events, decreasing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life. 3 National and international guidelines recommend long-term use of evidence-based medication for management of CHD, such as use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and statins, as first-line therapy; or other antiplatelet medication, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or fibrate when first-line therapy is contraindicated. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite this well-established knowledge, not all patients with CHD are able to obtain the standard treatment endorsed by the guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study from our group only 3.5% of patients achieved six pre-specifi ed prevention goals 2 years after acute myocardial infarction and non-fatal cardiovascular events occurred in 46.5% of the participants. 100 A reasonable question is whether the above-described changes in cardiovascular risk factors and diseases have an impact on the incidence and risk profi le of HF in the contemporary era with gradually improved primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention (despite remaining suboptimal).…”
Section: Risk-factors For the Development Of Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is to decrease morbidity and mortality, and improve quality of life post MI [13,14]. Guidelines for CR uniformly recommend behavioural/lifestyle interventions targeting smoking cessation, regular exercise training and increased daily physical activity, maintaining a healthy body weight, optimal control of risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose control), and adherence to cardioprotective drug therapies [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%