Long‐term sealing ability of resin‐based root canal fillings

Santos, João Filipe; Tjäderhane, Leo; Ferraz, Caio Cézar Randi; Zaia, Alexandre Augusto; Alves, Marcelo Corrêa; Góes, Mário Fernando de; Carrilho, Marcela Rocha de Oliveira

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01687.x

Cited by 48 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 31 publications

(73 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Restorative dentistry concepts using adhesive materials have increasingly been applied to endodontics to prevent coronal leakage (2,11), such as use of fibre posts in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (14), and even for the filling of the root canal (15). The use of these materials is based on the premise that because of the intimate contact with dentine, these materials could remain micromechanically retained, reinforcing tooth structure and preventing root contamination (16).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some characteristics as ease and speed of placement, sealing efficacy, and high bond strength qualify the ideal restorative material to barrier (11), and the use of dentin bonding agents has been advocated to help provide a better intracoronal seal (12). Therefore the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability sealing of glass ionomer and composite resin with or without 1-mm thickness of Coltosol on the root-canal filling material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coronal microleakage of restorations with or without cervical barrier in root-filled teeth

Damman¹,

Grazziotin‐Soares²,

Farina³

et al. 2012

Rev. odonto ciênc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate the ability sealing of glass ionomer and composite resin with or without 1-mm thickness of Coltosol on the root-canal filling material.Methods: Root-canal treatment was completed on 50-extracted human mandibular unirradicular. The teeth were divided into six groups: G1, positive control; G2, negative control; G3, glass ionomer (Vidrion R); G4, Coltosol + Vidrion R; G5, composite resin; and, G6, Coltosol + composite resin. For G1 and G2 five teeth each were used and for the other groups, ten teeth each. The teeth were thermocycled and evaluated for microleakage using methylene blue dye. Specimens were sectioned and measurements made to the maximum point of dye penetration. The mean dye penetration (%) for each group was compared by ANOVA and Tukey's test for post-hoc comparisons (α=0.05).Results: The means and standard deviations of microleakage were: G1, 96.56 (±2.31); G2, 0.00 (±0.00); G3, 68.76 (±24.63); G4, 24.42 (±8.33); G5, 20.06 (±9.35); and, G6, 12.86 (±6.08).Conclusion: It was concluded that none of the materials were able to prevent microleakage. Composite resin alone or combined with coltosol and glass ionomer associated with coltosol resulted in less microleakage than the glass ionomer used alone.Key words: Coronal microleakage; adhesive system; composite resin; temporary fillings ResumoObjetivos: Avaliar a capacidade de selamento do ionomero de vidro e resina composta, com ou sem 1 mm de coltosol, sobre o material obturador endodôntico.Métodos: O tratamento endodôntico foi realizado em 50 dentes humanos mandibulares unirradiculares. Os dentes foram divididos em 6 grupos: G1, controle positivo; G2, controle negativo; G3, ionômero de vidro (Vidrion R); G4, Coltosol + Vidrion R; G5, resina composta; e, G6, Coltosol + resina composta. Os dentes foram submetidos a termociclagem e a avaliação da microinfiltração usando azul de metileno. Os especimes foram seccionados e a quantidade maxima de penetração de corante avaliado. As medias e desvios-padrão de penetração do corante (em %) para cada grupo foram analisadas pelo teste ANOVA e pelo teste de multiplas comparações de Tukey's (α=0.05).Resultados: As medias e desvios-padrão de midroinfiltração foram: G1: 96,56 (±2,31); G2: 0,00 (±0,00); G3: 68,76 (±24,63); G4: 24,42 (±8,33); G5: 20,06 (±9,35); and, G6: 12,86 (±6,08).Conclusão: Pode-se concluir que nenhum material obturador preveniu completamente a microinfiltração. Resina composta utilizada isoladamente ou associada ao coltosol e o ionômero de vidro associado ao coltosol apresentaram menor microinfiltração do que o ionomero de vidro utilizado sozinho.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronal microleakage of restorations with or without cervical barrier in root-filled teeth

Damman¹,

Grazziotin‐Soares²,

Farina³

et al. 2012

Rev. odonto ciênc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No difference was detected between coronal restorative materials: Coltosol or Clearfil SE Bond. 97 Another study has shown the same results by using glass-ionomer. 98 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Resilon: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Lotfi,

Ghasemi,

Rahimi

et al. 2013

Journal of Dental Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] However, analysis of leakage studies must be carried out with caution as a 'superior' result has a different meaning depending on the technique employed. For example, in a dye penetration test a published; these studies form the bulk of the scientific research on Resilon.…”

Section: Sealing Ability/leakagementioning

confidence: 99%