2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41434-021-00295-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term safety and efficacy of intramyocardial adenovirus-mediated VEGF-DΔNΔC gene therapy eight-year follow-up of phase I KAT301 study

Abstract: In phase I KAT301 trial, intramyocardial adenovirus-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor -DΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D) gene therapy (GT) resulted in a significant improvement in myocardial perfusion reserve and relieved symptoms in refractory angina patients at 1-year follow-up without major safety concerns. We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of AdVEGF-D GT. 30 patients (24 in VEGF-D group and 6 blinded, randomized controls) were followed for 8.2 years (range 6.3–10.4 years). Patients were interviewe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC is a promising new therapeutic candidate for severe coronary heart disease, as it induced angiogenesis, increased perfusion and improved cardiac function as well as increased the growth of functional lymphatic network. AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC has also entered clinical testing (Hartikainen et al, 2017;Korpela et al, 2021;Leikas et al, 2022). However further studies are needed to optimize the beneficial effects, evaluate the long-term safety and find the patient groups that may benefit from the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC is a promising new therapeutic candidate for severe coronary heart disease, as it induced angiogenesis, increased perfusion and improved cardiac function as well as increased the growth of functional lymphatic network. AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC has also entered clinical testing (Hartikainen et al, 2017;Korpela et al, 2021;Leikas et al, 2022). However further studies are needed to optimize the beneficial effects, evaluate the long-term safety and find the patient groups that may benefit from the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, although we did not observe any adverse changes in the tested endpoints indicative of arrhythmogenicity, we acknowledge that the study was unpowered to completely exclude the possible arrhythmia risk related to intramyocardial AdVEGF‐D GT. Moreover, despite RA patients being at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events irrespective of the treatment, 8 it is worth noting that the observed favorable findings in HRV might also be explained by the fact that the study patients, including both AdVEGF‐D and control patients, were under careful supervision and their overall treatment was optimized during their participation in the trial, which might have translated into their better cardiac and overall health and better values in the HRV analysis. Even though a similar behavior in the frequency bands was not observed in the control group, this should also be interpreted with caution as a result of the low number of patients, particularly those who received placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the primary purpose of KAT301 was to establish the safety and the feasibility of the treatment, the intervention was also found to increase myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed with 15 O‐H 2 O positron emission tomography (PET) and reduce angina symptoms (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class; CCS). Subsequently, intramyocardial AdVEGF‐D GT has been shown to be associated with a similar incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and overall comorbidity than placebo during an 8‐year follow‐up 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, vascular normalization therapies, where increases in VEGF signaling would promote blood vessel growth or enhanced function, demonstrate their own challenges most typically related to delivery kinetics, administration routes, and ability to evaluate clinical outcomes (259)(260)(261). To address these challenges, some groups have begun investigating gene therapy as a technique to create a more sustained and controllable deliver of VEGF; an example of this is recent data from a clinical trial where VEGF-D delivered by adeno-associated viruses decreased angina associated symptoms in a majority of patients, with similar levels of major cardiac adverse events compared to control groups (262).…”
Section: Anti-vegf Treatments Side Effects and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%