2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term retention of alizarin red S marks and coded wire tags in European eels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed marking success rates with ARS ranged from 98% to 100% between tanks and from 98% to 99% between treatments 28 to 49 days after marking in the treatments with concentrations of 150 mg ARS L −1 , fish densities ≤50 g L −1 , and bath temperatures of ≥10°C in the present study (Figure 2). Comparable marking success rates between 97.7% and 100% were observed by Simon and Wickström (2020) in three lakes 1–14 years after restocking with ARS marked glass eels. Other studies marking glass eels with ARS concentrations of 150 mg L −1 found 100% marking success in 10, 30, and 60 investigated eels, 14 days, 15 days, and 2 years after the marking event (Caraguel et al, 2015; Kullmann et al, 2018; Simon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observed marking success rates with ARS ranged from 98% to 100% between tanks and from 98% to 99% between treatments 28 to 49 days after marking in the treatments with concentrations of 150 mg ARS L −1 , fish densities ≤50 g L −1 , and bath temperatures of ≥10°C in the present study (Figure 2). Comparable marking success rates between 97.7% and 100% were observed by Simon and Wickström (2020) in three lakes 1–14 years after restocking with ARS marked glass eels. Other studies marking glass eels with ARS concentrations of 150 mg L −1 found 100% marking success in 10, 30, and 60 investigated eels, 14 days, 15 days, and 2 years after the marking event (Caraguel et al, 2015; Kullmann et al, 2018; Simon et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Other studies marking glass eels with ARS concentrations of 150 mg L −1 found 100% marking success in 10, 30, and 60 investigated eels, 14 days, 15 days, and 2 years after the marking event (Caraguel et al, 2015; Kullmann et al, 2018; Simon et al, 2009). In the present study, where 135–216 eels per experiment and marking group were investigated and in the study of Simon and Wickström (2020) where distinctly higher numbers of eels were investigated, marking success was not 100%. This shows that statistical analysis of the number of marked eels, mark retention of marks, and a conclusion of mark success rates of 100% based on the investigation of a low number of marked fishes should be evaluated with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otoliths should be validated to ensure that one increment represents a day of growth (Panfili et al, 2009). A common technique to validate the otolith is to mark the otolith with a chemical at two known time points and compare the number of visible increments with the number of days elapsed between events (Simon & Wickstrom, 2020). One such chemical, Alizarin Red S (ARS hereon), is frequently used to mark otoliths as it has low toxicity (Bensimon‐Brito et al, 2016) and is cost effective compared to other stains, such as oxytetracycline (Niva et al, 2005).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 52 power stations generating more than 1 million kilowatts, and 107 power stations generating more than 300,000 kilowatts, as well as many medium and small hydropower stations that have been built or are under construction (He et al, 2011;Chu, Liu & Pan, 2019). Its plastic tags, otolith marking (Saito et al, 2020), coded wires (Simon & Wickström, 2020), fluorescent elastomer tags, visible alphanumeric plastic tags or passive integrated transponders (Hanson et al, 2020), as well as heritable genetic marks such as mitochondrial DNA, minisatellites, microsatellites, transcribed sequences, anonymous cDNA or random amplified polymorphic DNAs (Gharrett et al, 2001;Hsu et al, 2020) before release should be seriously considered. It is better to identify the hatchery of origin for fish captured in the wild during the monitoring programme, hence the suggestion of 'familyprinting' for released M. asiaticus (Letcher & King, 1999).…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of M Asiaticus Populations In the Upper Ya...mentioning
confidence: 99%