Long-term retention of a divided attention psycho-motor test combining choice reaction test and postural balance test: A preliminary study

Rossi, R.; Pascolo, P.

doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.010

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…7.1 Force plate with visual feedback: A force plate can be used to carry out instructed tasks with visual feedback on a display [ 66 ]. The visual feedback can be applied to give a semi-immersive virtual reality balancing task where the participant has to balance a virtual balance board [ 67 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A brief remark on studies that utilized an uncategorized assessment method [ 66 – 73 ] is given in the following section. Efforts were made to develop the force plate method with visual feedback to provide an objective, on-field assessment of impairment, i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Efforts were made to develop the force plate method with visual feedback to provide an objective, on-field assessment of impairment, i.e. driving under the influence [ 66 ]. The approach of another study utilizing the force plate with a semi-immersive virtual reality feedback is noteworthy, since in this setup less motion is required from the participant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Devices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing – A systematic literature review

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundStatic balancing assessment is often complemented with dynamic balancing tasks. Numerous dynamic balancing assessment methods have been developed in recent decades with their corresponding balancing devices and tasks.ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic literature review is to identify and categorize existing objective methods of standing dynamic balancing ability assessment with an emphasis on the balancing devices and tasks being used.Data SourcesThree major scientific literature databases (Science Direct, Web of Science, PLoS ONE) and additional sources were used.Study selectionStudies had to use a dynamic balancing device and a task described in detail. Evaluation had to be based on objectively measureable parameters. Functional tests without instrumentation evaluated exclusively by a clinician were excluded. A total of 63 articles were included.Data extractionThe data extracted during full-text assessment were: author and date; the balancing device with the balancing task and the measured parameters; the health conditions, size, age and sex of participant groups; and follow-up measurements.Data synthesisA variety of dynamic balancing assessment devices were identified and categorized as 1) Solid ground, 2) Balance board, 3) Rotating platform, 4) Horizontal translational platform, 5) Treadmill, 6) Computerized Dynamic Posturography, and 7) Other devices. The group discrimination ability of the methods was explored and the conclusions of the studies were briefly summarized.LimitationsDue to the wide scope of this search, it provides an overview of balancing devices and do not represent the state-of-the-art of any single method.ConclusionsThe identified dynamic balancing assessment methods are offered as a catalogue of candidate methods to complement static assessments used in studies involving postural control.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation