Long-term Results with Cementless Fitek (or Fitmore) Cups

Marchetti, P.; Binazzi, Roberto; Vaccari, Vittorio; Girolami, Mauro; Morici, Francesca; Impallomeni, Carlo; Commessatti, Matteo; Silvello, L

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.019

Cited by 105 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6,10 The maximum HHS is 100, and outcomes have been interpreted as: 100-90 = excellent; 89-80 = good; 79-70 = fair; <70 = poor. 11 An adverse functional outcome in this study was defined as an HHS < 70, equating to a poor result. QOL and general health was assessed using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), a generic measure of health status that has been validated previously in the setting of joint arthroplasty.…”

Section: Functional and Qol Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early prosthetic hip joint infection treated with debridement, prosthesis retention and biofilm‐active antibiotics: functional outcomes, quality of life and complications

Aboltins

Dowsey

Peel

et al. 2013

Internal Medicine Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Functional and Qol Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early prosthetic hip joint infection treated with debridement, prosthesis retention and biofilm‐active antibiotics: functional outcomes, quality of life and complications

Aboltins

Dowsey

Peel

et al. 2013

Internal Medicine Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We studied preoperative and postoperative outcomes using the Quality of Well-being [14,15], SF-36 [1,22], WOMAC [3], Harris hip score [12,23], and Merle d'Aubigné-Postel [11]. ROM was assessed using a standard handheld goniometer for hip abduction, adduction, flexion, and internal and external rotation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Perceived Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: Does Gender Matter?

Lavernia

Alcerro

Contreras

et al. 2011

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides high functional scores and long-term survivorship. However, differences in function and disability between men and women before and after arthroplasty are not well understood. Questions/purposes We determined if there was a gender difference in patient-perceived functional measures and range of motion in primary THA. Methods We retrospectively studied 532 patients (658 hips) undergoing primary THA. A total of 59% were women and 41% were men. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at minimum 2 years using Quality of Well-being, SF-36, WOMAC, and Harris hip score. We determined if differences existed between genders before and at followup for all dependent measures. Independent t-tests were also used to determine differences between genders concerning the change (D) scores and hip range of motion. The time course of perceived functional recovery was also documented.

show abstract

“…3). A difference of less than 2 points would also not be considered a clinically significant difference [24,25].…”

Section: Primary Outcome Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

Smith

Blake

Hing

2010

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past decade, minimally invasive surgery has gained popularity as a means of optimising early postoperative rehabilitation and increasing patient satisfaction and cosmesis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, this surgical exposure has also been associated with increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury and implant mal-positioning due to limited visibility compared to conventionally larger surgical incisions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical exposures. A systematic review of the published and unpublished literature was conducted to include all randomised and non-randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive and conventional THA procedures. In total, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria and included 2,849 hips, i.e. 1,428 minimally invasive compared to 1,421 conventional THAs. The meta-analysis of the current evidence base showed that minimally invasive THA is associated with a significantly increased risk of transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (p=0.006) with no significantly better outcome.

show abstract

Long-term Results with Cementless Fitek (or Fitmore) Cups

Cited by 105 publications

References 30 publications

Early prosthetic hip joint infection treated with debridement, prosthesis retention and biofilm‐active antibiotics: functional outcomes, quality of life and complications

Early prosthetic hip joint infection treated with debridement, prosthesis retention and biofilm‐active antibiotics: functional outcomes, quality of life and complications

Patient Perceived Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: Does Gender Matter?

Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About