1995
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00489-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of treatment of cervical carcinoma in the United States in 1973, 1978, and 1983: Patterns of Care Study (PCS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,10,12 In the large LDR series, the 5-year PC and OS rates were approximately 90% and 80%, respectively, for patients with Stage IB disease, 70 -80% and 60 -70%, respectively, for patients with Stage II disease, and 50 -70% and 30 -50%, respectively, for patients with Stage III disease. [22][23][24][25][26] The outcomes achieved in the current series therefore were comparable to those of the large LDR series. The strong correlation between tumor size and treatment outcome is well documented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,10,12 In the large LDR series, the 5-year PC and OS rates were approximately 90% and 80%, respectively, for patients with Stage IB disease, 70 -80% and 60 -70%, respectively, for patients with Stage II disease, and 50 -70% and 30 -50%, respectively, for patients with Stage III disease. [22][23][24][25][26] The outcomes achieved in the current series therefore were comparable to those of the large LDR series. The strong correlation between tumor size and treatment outcome is well documented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The strong correlation between tumor size and treatment outcome is well documented. 5,[22][23][24][25][26] The variation of treatment results among the different reports may be due to the wide range of tumor sizes, even for patients with the same stage of disease. The number of bulky tumors in our patient population was relatively small compared with the number of tumors in the American and European series, 22,23 and this might account for the more favorable outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most investigators correlated tumor size and stage with the 5-year survival (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Bulky tumor was defined as Ͼ6 cm (32,55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is considered the standard of care, except in younger patients with early-stage disease. Many large series have reported 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 80 -90% for Stage I, 55-70% for Stage II, 30 -50% for Stage III, and 10 -15% for Stage IV disease (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Conventional ICBT with tandem and ovoids or ovoids alone may not deliver an adequate dose in cases of extensive and bulky tumors, obliterated fornices, lower vaginal involvement, and carcinoma of the cervical stump (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite worldwide efforts at screening with the aim of detecting cervical cancer in the early stage, many cancers are not discovered until already advanced. Traditionally, radical hysterectomy or radiation therapy alone has been accepted as standard treatment for early-stage invasive cervical cancer, and locally advanced cancer has been treated by radiotherapy alone consisting of a combination of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (Coia et al, 1990;Komaki et al, 1995;Barillot et al, 1997). In the past few years, substantial advances in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer have been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%