1999
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1998.0643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of radical surgery for rectal cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival and local recurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
29
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These include tumour level within the rectum 20 -22 , tumour size 23 , macroscopic morphology 24 , distal clearance 3,22,25 , circumferential clearance 26 -28 , depth of tumour invasion 28 -31 , lymph node metastasis 21,23,26,29 -31 , number of involved nodes 25,32 , tumour stage 3,6,20,22,24,33 -35 , grade of differentiation 20,23,26,28,32 , infiltrating tumour margin 26 , vascular invasion 3,6,22,26 , sex 22 , age 25,31 , intraoperative spillage of tumour cells 6,20 , anastomotic leakage 22,34 , experience and specialization of the surgeon 6,20 , surgical technique 3,22,35 , interhospital variability 20 and adjuvant therapy 6,23,31,33 . However, an extensive literature search by the authors failed to find any publications in which the position of the tumour was considered as a possible risk factor for local recurrence, although in one study position was found to be associated with cancer-specific mortality 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include tumour level within the rectum 20 -22 , tumour size 23 , macroscopic morphology 24 , distal clearance 3,22,25 , circumferential clearance 26 -28 , depth of tumour invasion 28 -31 , lymph node metastasis 21,23,26,29 -31 , number of involved nodes 25,32 , tumour stage 3,6,20,22,24,33 -35 , grade of differentiation 20,23,26,28,32 , infiltrating tumour margin 26 , vascular invasion 3,6,22,26 , sex 22 , age 25,31 , intraoperative spillage of tumour cells 6,20 , anastomotic leakage 22,34 , experience and specialization of the surgeon 6,20 , surgical technique 3,22,35 , interhospital variability 20 and adjuvant therapy 6,23,31,33 . However, an extensive literature search by the authors failed to find any publications in which the position of the tumour was considered as a possible risk factor for local recurrence, although in one study position was found to be associated with cancer-specific mortality 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is scored as yes/no/unclear. Bias items include elements of study design and execution (items 3,4,5,6,7,12,14), and interpretation (items 10,11), and generalizability items refer to the composition of patients selected (items 1,2). The…”
Section: Assessment Of Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei Tumoren des oberen Rektumdrittels erfolgt die TME mindestens 5 cm distal des makroskopischen Tumorrands, gemessen in vivo. Das Mesorektum sollte hierbei horizontal durchtrennt werden, um eine vollständige Tumorentfernung sicherzustellen [27]. Dieser Sicherheitsabstand resultiert aus der Beobachtung, dass bei T3-und T4-Rektumkarzinomen in seltenen Fällen Satellitenknoten oder Lymphknotenmetastasen in bis zu 4 cm distal des makroskopischen Tumorrands vorkommen können [32].…”
Section: Neoadjuvante Therapieunclassified