2015
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of carmustine wafer implantation for newly diagnosed glioblastomas: a controlled propensity-matched analysis of a French multicenter cohort

Abstract: Carmustine wafer implantation during surgical resection followed by the standard chemoradiation protocol for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As patients aged >65 years who were not treated with BCNU wafers had a numerically higher rate of complete resection at surgery for recurrent GBM (62.5 vs. 45.8%), yet a lower PFS2 than elderly patients with BCNU wafer implantation (7.6 vs. 9.2 months), we argue that the comparability of the groups may be flawed and that the positive effect of BCNU on survival may be underestimated in our study. The 1.6-month improvement in median survival after implantation of BCNU wafers for first recurrent GBM and the 1.3-month improvement in OS in the older BCNU group over the control older non-BCNU group are roughly comparable with the available data, which showed an improvement in OS of 2-2.4 months [10,20] . Curiously, comparing survival data between the younger and the older BCNU group, there was no significant difference in OS (19.0 vs. 17.2 months), which might be explained by the fact that only patients in good condition (Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70) underwent a second tumor resection with wafer implantation, independent of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As patients aged >65 years who were not treated with BCNU wafers had a numerically higher rate of complete resection at surgery for recurrent GBM (62.5 vs. 45.8%), yet a lower PFS2 than elderly patients with BCNU wafer implantation (7.6 vs. 9.2 months), we argue that the comparability of the groups may be flawed and that the positive effect of BCNU on survival may be underestimated in our study. The 1.6-month improvement in median survival after implantation of BCNU wafers for first recurrent GBM and the 1.3-month improvement in OS in the older BCNU group over the control older non-BCNU group are roughly comparable with the available data, which showed an improvement in OS of 2-2.4 months [10,20] . Curiously, comparing survival data between the younger and the older BCNU group, there was no significant difference in OS (19.0 vs. 17.2 months), which might be explained by the fact that only patients in good condition (Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70) underwent a second tumor resection with wafer implantation, independent of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, the highly infiltrative nature of this tumor, as well as its aggressiveness, leads to systematic failure of current therapeutics. Despite few improvements resulting from the development of second-line treatments such as antiangiogenic agents, the overall prognosis remains dismal and the median survival is 15 to 18 months (2). Furthermore, the neurological dysfunctions induced by tumor progression strongly impair the quality of life of patients (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment modalities usually include maximal resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with the common use of temozolomide as first-line treatment (Stupp et al, 2005). However, GBM remain incurable and median survival remains close to 18 months (Pallud et al, 2015). As most malignant and fast-growing tumors, GBM cells are exposed to high cellular stress levels due to inadequate blood supply, hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, as well as to immune reactions and to various therapeutic treatments.…”
Section: Er Stress In Primary Brain Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%