2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of allogeneic penetrating limbo-keratoplasty in total limbal stem cell deficiency*1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
63
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there was an improvement in visual acuity from 0.02 to 0.24 in patients with a clear graft and from 0.02 to 0.03 in cases of failure. The best visual acuity observed after long-term follow-up was 0.45 in patients with a clear graft and 0.26 in cases of failure (23) . Solomon et al evaluated 39 eyes that underwent CLAL with AM, with or without penetrating keratoplasty, and found that the overall survival of ambulatory vision (deemed as visual acuity greater than 0.1) was 53.6% at 3 years and 44.6% at 5 years (26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, there was an improvement in visual acuity from 0.02 to 0.24 in patients with a clear graft and from 0.02 to 0.03 in cases of failure. The best visual acuity observed after long-term follow-up was 0.45 in patients with a clear graft and 0.26 in cases of failure (23) . Solomon et al evaluated 39 eyes that underwent CLAL with AM, with or without penetrating keratoplasty, and found that the overall survival of ambulatory vision (deemed as visual acuity greater than 0.1) was 53.6% at 3 years and 44.6% at 5 years (26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The definition of surgical success in studies on limbal stem cell deficiency varies in the literature, but it mostly includes reepithelialization and visual results, which respectively indicate anatomical and functional recovery of the ocular surface (22)(23)(24) . Shimazaki et al used the detection of donor tissue-derived epithelial cells in patients who underwent heterologous LSCT combined with penetrating keratoplasty, comparing with isolated cases of pe netrating keratoplasty as controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-inflammatory drugs are not sufficient to suppress angiogenesis, conjunctivalization, and corneal scarring. LSC transplantation has a high risk of immune rejection [1,2] . Corneal transplantation remains the main and effective method for visual rehabilitation once a disease has affected corneal clarity [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limbal autografts risk creating LSCD in the donor eye (6) and cannot be used in patients with bilateral LSCD. Limbal allografts require long-term systemic immunosuppression, and even with immunosuppression, rejection occurs in 42.9% to 64.0% of patients (7,8). One therapeutic strategy for corneal inflammation is the use of the adult stem/progenitor cells from bone marrow referred to as mesenchymal stem cells or multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%