2021
DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term reproductive evaluation of a bitch neonatally treated with a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist

Abstract: In mammals, high concentrations of gonadotropins are necessary early in life to reach a full-sized pool of ovarian follicles at the age of puberty. This case report describes the reproductive status of a 28-month-old, 9.1 kg, crossbred bitch (Bitch 1) which had been treated neonatally with 18.8 deslorelin acetate subcutaneously for contraceptive purposes. The female had just passed pubertal oestrus when hormones were measured and then spayed. The ovaries were histologically assessed. Two crossbred bitches were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have estimated the total number of preantral follicles in bitches. In line with previous reports, there was a large variation in the numbers of follicles among these females [20,21]. Furthermore, the mean number of follicles found here was similar to the ones previously reported using the same formula [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Few studies have estimated the total number of preantral follicles in bitches. In line with previous reports, there was a large variation in the numbers of follicles among these females [20,21]. Furthermore, the mean number of follicles found here was similar to the ones previously reported using the same formula [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In line with previous reports, there was a large variation in the numbers of follicles among these females [20,21]. Furthermore, the mean number of follicles found here was similar to the ones previously reported using the same formula [20,21]. Minor differences among studies could be explained by the species variability and operators' bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation