2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term renal outcome in patients with malignant hypertension: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundMalignant hypertension is frequently complicated by renal insufficiency. Although the survival of this hypertensive emergency has improved, recent data on renal outcome and its predictors are lacking. We assessed renal outcome and its predictors in patients with malignant hypertension.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients admitted with malignant hypertension in Amsterdam, the Netherlands between August 1992–January 2010. Follow-up data on vital status, renal function and blood pressure (BP) were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with MHT had a favorable cardiovascular risk profile compared with HT controls but had severe renal dysfunction. Since uncontrolled hypertension is the only modifiable predictor of long-term renal outcome and mortality in patients with MHT, 4 tight BP control should be the primary goal in the management of patients with history of MHT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Patients with MHT had a favorable cardiovascular risk profile compared with HT controls but had severe renal dysfunction. Since uncontrolled hypertension is the only modifiable predictor of long-term renal outcome and mortality in patients with MHT, 4 tight BP control should be the primary goal in the management of patients with history of MHT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this, we performed a sensitivity analysis showing that no patients with a history of MHT who visited the emergency department between 1992 and 2008 were missed. 4 Secondly, the age range of SUNSET participants was limited to 35 to 60 years, whereas the patients with a history of MHT were aged 19 to 79 years. Nonetheless, most patients with a history of MHT who fell outside this age range were younger than 35, implying a lower mortality risk, and the mean age of deceased patients was similar among all groups.…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations