1994
DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90218-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term recovery following surgical treatment for ulnar artery occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Seven of the 8 reconstructions remained patent. Most patients in both groups had improved, but had persistent symptoms.…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19 Seven of the 8 reconstructions remained patent. Most patients in both groups had improved, but had persistent symptoms.…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A DBI of less than 0.7 indicates that arterial inflow to the digit is inadequate and arterial reconstruction is indicated. 19 If vascular studies are not available in the operating room, rapidity of flow return to the affected fingers can be used as an estimate of arterial inflow. If refill occurs in less than 6 seconds after release of the tourniquet, blood supply is probably adequate.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ligation, performed to prevent further thromboembolism, requires proven adequate collateral circulation and some have used a DBI of 0.7 as the cut point in determining simple ligation versus surgical reconstruction. 24 Although the nutritional benefits of revascularization would seem obvious, Lifchez's retrospective data suggest a more complex pathophysiology. 25 In a group of 14 patients treated with surgical reconstruction, late postoperative occlusion rates were greater than 40%.…”
Section: Management Of Hhsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,7 Therefore, treatment remains controversial. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of ulnar artery reconstruction with reverse interpositional vein grafting (RIVG) for posttraumatic ulnar artery and superficial arch thrombosis with a minimum of 2 years follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%