1989
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term prophylaxis with C1-inhibitor (C1 INH) concentrate in patients with recurrent angioedema caused by hereditary and acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
79
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…C′1 inhibitor concentrate has been used successfully for long term replacement in selected adult patients, 74 and more recently it has been shown to be superior to a placebo in a double blind controlled study. 60 Based on the clinical benefit seen in these patients, a role for C′1 inhibitor concentrate in long term prophylaxis for children has been suggested, 60 supporting the few earlier proposals.…”
Section: Long Term Prophylaxis Of Attacks In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C′1 inhibitor concentrate has been used successfully for long term replacement in selected adult patients, 74 and more recently it has been shown to be superior to a placebo in a double blind controlled study. 60 Based on the clinical benefit seen in these patients, a role for C′1 inhibitor concentrate in long term prophylaxis for children has been suggested, 60 supporting the few earlier proposals.…”
Section: Long Term Prophylaxis Of Attacks In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C1 inhibitor concentrate has been used successfully for longterm replacement in selected adult patients [124], and more recently it has been shown to be superior to a placebo in a double-blind controlled study [76]. In an uncontrolled trial during long-term follow-up of 14 children with C1 INH deficiency, acute attacks in six children were treated with a single dose of 500 U of C1 INH concentrate (Immuno AG, Vienna, Austria) on 30 separate administrations.…”
Section: C1 Inhibitor Concentrate In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other conditions are self limiting but danazol, stanolol have been tried for acute condition, or for prevention of attacks [5,7]. Aminoepsolic acid has been tried but failed [4]. There is no role of steroids, antihistamines, adrenaline locally or nor epinephrine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%