Long-term prognosis of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Machado, Luci Diva Brocardo; Nascimento, Rizomar Ramos do; Ferreira, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira; Mattos, Cláudia Trindade; Vilella, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.010

Cited by 102 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Eleven radiological variables were selected based on the available evidence in literature regarding their relation to treatment outcome (Almpani, Papageorgiou, & Papadopoulos, ; Atala‐Acevedo et al, ; Chung, Tu, Lin, & Lu, ; Machado, do Nascimento, Ferreira, Mattos, & Vilella, ). The radiological variables were based on the follow‐up protocols of multiple studies concerning autotransplantation of maxillary canines (Ahlberg, Bystedt, Eliasson, & Odenrick, ; Arikan et al, ; Chambers, Reade, & Poker, ; Gonnissen et al, ; Hall & Reade, ; Kallu, Vinckier, Politis, Mwalili, & Willems, ; Kvint, Lindsten, Magnusson, Nilsson, & Bjerklin, ; Lownie, Cleaton‐Jones, Fatti, & Lownie, ; Patel, Fanshawe, Bister, & Cobourne, ; Pogrel, ; Sagne, Lennartsson, & Thilander, ; Sagne & Thilander, ; Schatz & Joho, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index

Grisar

Vanpoecke

Raes

et al. 2018

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to propose and validate an index evaluating 2D and 3D radiographic variables of autotransplanted maxillary canines. Setting and sample population are from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Eight oral‐maxillofacial surgeons rated 12 autotransplanted maxillary canines and adjacent bone using 11 rating variables. A new autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index (AMCRI) was proposed. It consisted of 11 variables. These variables were based on 2D (intraoral) and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss's kappa statistics were performed to analyze intrarater and interrater agreement. Considering cumulative assessment of the AMCRI, the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the eight examiners was 0.94, representing an excellent agreement. Intrarater agreement was 0.91. The AMCRI is an objective tool in rating radiological outcome of autotransplanted canines and adjacent bone, when compared with the contralateral canine.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index

Grisar

Vanpoecke

Raes

et al. 2018

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, another available option may be replacing the missing tooth with another tooth. [49][50][51][52] Reported complications of autotransplantation include pulp necrosis, root resorption, and hypermobility. 48 Success rates for this procedure are as high as 96% and survival rates as high as 98% for autotransplanted teeth.…”

Section: Autotransplantationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…48 Success rates for this procedure are as high as 96% and survival rates as high as 98% for autotransplanted teeth. [49][50][51][52] Reported complications of autotransplantation include pulp necrosis, root resorption, and hypermobility. 53 Not only is autotransplantation a good option because of high success rates, it is also a good option for growing patients who cannot have dental implants placed.…”

Section: Autotransplantationmentioning

confidence: 99%

In the dental implant era, why do we still bother saving teeth?

Clark

Levin

2019

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teeth are vital sensory organs that contribute to our daily activities of living. Unfortunately, teeth can be lost for several reasons including trauma, caries, and periodontal disease. Although dental trauma injuries and caries are more frequently encountered in a younger population, tooth loss because of periodontal disease occurs in the older population. In the dental implant era, the trend sometimes seems to be to extract compromised teeth and replace them with dental implants. However, the long‐term prognosis of teeth might not be comparable with the prognosis of dental implants. Complications, failures, and diseases such as peri‐implantitis are not uncommon, and, despite popular belief, implants are not 99% successful. Other treatment options that aim to save compromised or diseased teeth such as endodontic treatment, periodontal treatment, intentional replantation, and autotransplantation should be considered on an individual basis. These treatments have competing success rates to dental implants but, more importantly, retain the natural tooth in the dentition for a longer period of time. These options are important to discuss in detail during treatment planning with patients in order to clarify any misconceptions about teeth and dental implants. In the event a tooth does have to be extracted, procedures such as decoronation and orthodontic extrusion might be useful to preserve hard and soft tissues for future dental implant placement. Regardless of the treatment modality, it is critical that strict maintenance and follow‐up protocols are implemented and that treatment planning is ethically responsible and evidence based.

show abstract

“…There are many reasons for tooth autotransplantation, but the most common indication is the natural replacement of a tooth as a result of complicated dental fracture, deep caries or failure in endodontic treatment. In addition, tooth transplantation may be employed to treat patients with congenital tooth absence, pre-existing impacted or ectopic teeth and spaces [4][5][6]. Autotransplantation is recommended in patients with orthodontic indications, which requires extraction of their permanent teeth when potential donors are available.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology at the service of surgery in a new technique of autotransplantation by guided surgery: a case report

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this case report was to use a surgical technique for autotransplantation of tooth using virtually planned 3D printed surgical templates for guided osteotomy preparation of the recipient of donor tooth. Case presentation: An 18-year-old male patient received autotransplantation of the right mandibular third molar to replace an included right second molar. This procedure was based on guided implant surgery methods by superimposition of DICOM files and 3D data sets of the jaws. In order to design a 3D-printed template with the aid of a fully digital workflow; the third molar was conserved in PRGF during the surgical procedure and the tooth socket was prepared with a template and the help of a 3D-printed donor tooth copy in order to prevent iatrogenic damage to the donor tooth. This template and replica were manufactured using 3D-printing techniques. The transplanted tooth was placed in infra-occlusion and fixed with a suture splint and root canal therapy was performed 15 days later. The intervention was be accomplished by performing preplanned virtual transplantations with guided osteotomies to ensure accurate donor tooth placement in the new recipient site. The 24 months follow-up showed physiological clinical and radiologic results compatible with healing periradicular tissues. Conclusions: This approach enables the planning and production of a 3D printed surgical template using the latest diagnostic methods and techniques of guided implant surgery. These accurate virtually predesigned surgical templates and printed analogues of the donor tooth could facilitate autotransplantation, ensuring an atraumatic surgical protocol.

show abstract

Long-term prognosis of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 102 publications

References 23 publications

Development and validation of the autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index

Development and validation of the autotransplanted maxillary canine radiological index

In the dental implant era, why do we still bother saving teeth?

Technology at the service of surgery in a new technique of autotransplantation by guided surgery: a case report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About