2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10933-017-9989-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term precipitation-driven salinity change in a saline, peat-forming wetland in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Canada: a diatom-based paleolimnological study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a hydrologic perspective, fens are geogenous ecosystems that receive nutrients from upland sources (i.e., via overland flow), groundwater, and atmospheric sources (Soudzilovskaia et al, ; Vitt, Wieder, Scott, & Faller, ). Although the subject is debated, based on vegetation indicators, four types of fen generally are recognized: poor, moderate‐rich, extreme‐rich, and saline, with moderate‐rich fens (MRFs) being the most common in the AOSR (Graham, Hartsock, Vitt, Wieder, & Gibson, ; Locky & Bayley, ; Purdy, MacDonald, & Lieffers, ; Slack, Vitt, & Horton, ; Vitt, Achuff, & Andrus, ; Vitt & Chee, ; Volik et al, ). In short, poor fens (PFs) are acidic systems dominated at a ground layer by mosses in the genus Sphagnum , MRFs have neutral porewaters and exhibit greater plant species richness compared with PFs, extreme‐rich fens have alkaline porewaters with elevated EC near 300 μS/cm, and SFs have porewaters dominated by the cation sodium and EC levels ranging from 2,000 to 30,000 μS/cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a hydrologic perspective, fens are geogenous ecosystems that receive nutrients from upland sources (i.e., via overland flow), groundwater, and atmospheric sources (Soudzilovskaia et al, ; Vitt, Wieder, Scott, & Faller, ). Although the subject is debated, based on vegetation indicators, four types of fen generally are recognized: poor, moderate‐rich, extreme‐rich, and saline, with moderate‐rich fens (MRFs) being the most common in the AOSR (Graham, Hartsock, Vitt, Wieder, & Gibson, ; Locky & Bayley, ; Purdy, MacDonald, & Lieffers, ; Slack, Vitt, & Horton, ; Vitt, Achuff, & Andrus, ; Vitt & Chee, ; Volik et al, ). In short, poor fens (PFs) are acidic systems dominated at a ground layer by mosses in the genus Sphagnum , MRFs have neutral porewaters and exhibit greater plant species richness compared with PFs, extreme‐rich fens have alkaline porewaters with elevated EC near 300 μS/cm, and SFs have porewaters dominated by the cation sodium and EC levels ranging from 2,000 to 30,000 μS/cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gignac et al, 2004;Hartsock et al, 2019a;Slack et al, 1980;Vitt & Chee, 1990;Vitt et al, 1995), but lower than in saline fens in northern Alberta (cf. Hartsock et al, 2019b;Volik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elevation within the fen varies from 397 to 401 masl (Wells & Price, 2015a). Groundwater and surface water are dominated by Na + and Cl − while Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and SO 4 2− are also present (Volik et al, 2017); electrical conductivity of near-surface groundwater ranges from 19 to >60 mS cm −1 (Wells & Price, 2015b). pH of near-surface groundwater within the fen ranges from 6.5-7.5 (Wells & Price, 2015a Creek watershed, with elevation varying from 560 to 564 masl (Wood et al, 2016).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%