2005
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term persistence and efficacy of spinosad against Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) in wheat

Abstract: A laboratory study was undertaken to determine the persistence and efficacy of spinosad against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) in wheat stored for 9 months at 30 degrees C and 55 and 70% relative humidity. The aim was to investigate the potential of spinosad for protecting wheat from R. dominica during long-term storage in warm climates. Wheat was treated with spinosad at 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg kg(-1) grain and sampled after 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5 and 9 months of storage for bioassays and residue analyses. Residues were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly advantageous if a plant product is active for longer durations and protects or prevents the grain from further infestation. Previously, several compounds have been shown to be highly effective as long-term grain protectants having residual toxicity against most of the major stored product pests (Athanassiou et al 2004(Athanassiou et al , 2005Vayias et al 2006;Daglish and Nayak 2006;Stathers et al 2008). Arthur (1996) pointed out that the use of residual insecticides remains controversial because of the demand for the residue-free food.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly advantageous if a plant product is active for longer durations and protects or prevents the grain from further infestation. Previously, several compounds have been shown to be highly effective as long-term grain protectants having residual toxicity against most of the major stored product pests (Athanassiou et al 2004(Athanassiou et al , 2005Vayias et al 2006;Daglish and Nayak 2006;Stathers et al 2008). Arthur (1996) pointed out that the use of residual insecticides remains controversial because of the demand for the residue-free food.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before this, spinosad has already been proved very effective against a range of stored-grain insect species, even at lower rates than the application rate, in both laboratory (Fang et al 2002a, Toews and Subramanyam 2003, Nayak et al 2005, Daglish and Nayak 2006 and Þeld tests (Maier et al 2006, Subramanyam et al 2007, Daglish et al 2008. Due to the above-mentioned characteristics and its low mammalian toxicity, spinosad is a desirable alternative to the use of traditional grain protectants, especially organophosphorous insecticides (OPs), which often are very toxic to mammals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…progeny production counts, R. dominica was highly susceptible to spinetoram-treated wheat. This efficacy of spinosyns against R. dominica has been extensively examined for spinosad, the first commercially available spinosyn-based insecticide (Nayak et al, 2005;Daglish and Nayak, 2006;Athanassiou et al, 2011;Hertlein et al, 2011). Also, newer studies testing spinetoram against stored product pests, concluded that R. dominica is highly susceptible to this compound .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%