Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias 2019
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term overall survival and progression-free survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated by pirfenidone or nintedanib or their switch. Real world data from the EMPIRE registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the INPULSIS trials are supported by those from the randomized, double-blind, multinational, phase III INSTAGE trial evaluating nintedanib plus sildenafil versus nintedanib alone in the treatment of patients with advanced IPF [12] and numerous real-world studies (e.g. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]).…”
Section: Nintedanib: Clinical Considerations In Fibrotic Ildsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from the INPULSIS trials are supported by those from the randomized, double-blind, multinational, phase III INSTAGE trial evaluating nintedanib plus sildenafil versus nintedanib alone in the treatment of patients with advanced IPF [12] and numerous real-world studies (e.g. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]).…”
Section: Nintedanib: Clinical Considerations In Fibrotic Ildsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Real-world data on the long-term effectiveness of nintedanib in the treatment of IPF are available from a retrospective analysis of data from the European MultiPartner IPF (EMPIRE) registry, which compared nintedanib ( n = 637), pirfenidone ( n = 821), switched treatment (i.e. from nintedanib to pirfenidone or vice versa; n = 148) and other or no treatment ( n = 1139) [ 19 ]. The clinical effectiveness of nintedanib ( n = 593) and pirfenidone ( n = 662) was also evaluated in a retrospective cohort analysis using data from a US insurance database, in which patients with IPF treated with an antifibrotic drug were one-to-one propensity score matched with untreated patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Therapeutic Efficacy Of Nintedanibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysed group, the prognosis was more favourable for patients treated with nintedanib and those who changed one antifibrotic drug to the other. Nevertheless, in view of the limitations of this analysis, no definitive, generalised conclusions may be drawn [25].…”
Section: Effect Of Treatment With Nintedanib On Survivalmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results of an analysis of pooled data from 6 clinical trials, based on which a mathematical model was developed, are also optimistic; the average improvement in survival in patients treated with nintedanib compared to the placebo group is estimated at nearly 8 years (11.6 vs 3.7), and median survival is improved by 5.2 years (8.5 vs 3.3) [24]. No less promising are the results of a retrospective analysis of the population of 2745 patients with IPF included in the international register EMPIRE (which also includes Polish patients), presented at the congress of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) in 2019 and confirming a significant increase in overall and progression-free survival in patients treated with antifibrotic drugs as compared to untreated patients [25]. In the analysed group, the prognosis was more favourable for patients treated with nintedanib and those who changed one antifibrotic drug to the other.…”
Section: Effect Of Treatment With Nintedanib On Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Данные по выживаемости на терапии, проанализированные в самом большом европейском регистре ИЛФ EMPIRE [39], показали, что лучшая выживаемость наблюдалась в группе пациентов, где произошла смена антифибротических препаратов, а также в группе пациентов, получавших нинтеданиб (рис. 4).…”
Section: основные направления в леченииunclassified