2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for the management of base of tongue cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a median follow‐up time of 3.1 years, no patient in this cohort developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible, and only 3 patients developed grade 3 or 4 mucositis. In a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, Takácsi‐Nagy et al evaluated the outcomes of 60 patients with BOT cancer treated with EBRT (mean dose 62 Gy) and an HDR boost (mean dose 17 Gy). OS at 5 years was 47%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With a median follow‐up time of 3.1 years, no patient in this cohort developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible, and only 3 patients developed grade 3 or 4 mucositis. In a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, Takácsi‐Nagy et al evaluated the outcomes of 60 patients with BOT cancer treated with EBRT (mean dose 62 Gy) and an HDR boost (mean dose 17 Gy). OS at 5 years was 47%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a median follow-up time of 3.1 years, no patient in this cohort developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible, and only 3 patients developed grade 3 or 4 mucositis. In a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, Takácsi-Nagy et al 2 Although no prospective randomized studies have compared outcomes between EBRT and EBRT + BT, single institution studies have retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients treated with EBRT alone vs those treated with EBRT plus a BT boost. 11,30 Chen et al report 30 year outcomes of patients at a single institution treated with EBRT + BT vs EBRT (2D or 3D technique) vs EBRT (IMRT technique).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Brachytherapy (BT) with or without external beam RT (EBRT) can play an essential role in the treatment of certain tumor localizations in the H&N area except cases with bone invasion or proximity of large vessels, delivering an ablative dose to the target volume while sparing the critical and normal tissues - due to the rapid dose fall-off - which is not safely feasible with EBRT alone. 1 , 2 , 3 Image guided high-dose-rate BT (IGBT) with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been implemented improving the efficacy of BT. 4 IGBT decreases irradiated doses to critical structures without compromising target coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%