2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0711-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes of trimodality treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with cisplatin and/or 5-FU

Abstract: Higher radiation doses and more use of simultaneous cisplatin lead to higher pathologic response rates to N-RCT and may be associated with better survival outcomes. Prospective controlled trials are needed to assess the true value of intensified N-RCT regimens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common cancer-related complication in these patients is dysphagia with an increasing rate as the disease progresses, leading to nutritional compromise, pain, reduced performance status and deterioration of quality of life 3 , 4 . Many of these patients with severe clinical symptoms are not fit enough to undergo surgical resection or curative radiochemotherapy 5 , 6 . The latter approaches are not suitable for patients with distant metastases either 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common cancer-related complication in these patients is dysphagia with an increasing rate as the disease progresses, leading to nutritional compromise, pain, reduced performance status and deterioration of quality of life 3 , 4 . Many of these patients with severe clinical symptoms are not fit enough to undergo surgical resection or curative radiochemotherapy 5 , 6 . The latter approaches are not suitable for patients with distant metastases either 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for refusal of SR for these 53 patients were as follows: (1) patients' or physicians' preference for the planned treatment was changed during the N-RCT, such that RCT was continued to a curative dose without a break (group 1, n = 23, 44%); (2) patients were restaged after 4 weeks, and the tumor board decided to continue RCT because RO resection was unlikely and/or patients were medically unfit (group 2, n = 15, 28%); (3) patients refused continuation of any treatment (group 3, n = 15, 28%). Refusal of SR was significantly more likely in patients with longitudinal tumor dimension >8 cm and those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Aims and Background The primary objective was to assess the different reasons for refusal of surgical resection (SR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC), who were initially planned for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (N-RCT) + SR, but SR was not performed after N-RCT.
Methods and Study Design From 1988 to 2011, 311 patients with ESCC were treated with N-RCT in a tertiary referral center for esophageal diseases. Fifty-three patients were analyzed who received RCT with 40–45 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy in neoadjuvant intention, but in whom the treatment was stopped or switched to definitive RCT due to progression, patient decision, or new findings.
Results The reasons for refusal of SR for these 53 patients were as follows: (1) patients' or physicians' preference for the planned treatment was changed during the N-RCT, such that RCT was continued to a curative dose without a break (group 1, n = 23, 44%); (2) patients were restaged after 4 weeks, and the tumor board decided to continue RCT because RO resection was unlikely and/or patients were medically unfit (group 2, n = 15, 28%); (3) patients refused continuation of any treatment (group 3, n = 15, 28%). Refusal of SR was significantly more likely in patients with longitudinal tumor dimension >8 cm and those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several treatment strategies were introduced, surgery is considered the mainstay of ESCC treatments. However, the total outcome was still poor with a ten-year survival rate of less than 15% [25]. This is due to the recurrence of ESCC originating from residual cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%