2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5809-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer found to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Abstract: In patients with EGC who are confirmed to have lesions for which endoscopic treatment is not indicated on histopathological evaluation after ESD, additional surgery should be aggressively performed if the patient can tolerate such treatment. In elderly patients aged 75 years or older and patients with serious underlying diseases, follow-up observation was suggested to be one option in patients who give informed consent after receiving an explanation of the risk of recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous reports, 53,54,[57][58][59][60][61][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] LNM was not shown in 89.0% to 94.8% of patients who underwent additional surgery after noncurative ER for EGC. Accordingly, additional surgery for all such patients may be excessive and further risk stratification can be useful for deciding treatment strategy after ER.…”
Section: Risk-scoring System For Patients With Noncurative Resectionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the previous reports, 53,54,[57][58][59][60][61][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] LNM was not shown in 89.0% to 94.8% of patients who underwent additional surgery after noncurative ER for EGC. Accordingly, additional surgery for all such patients may be excessive and further risk stratification can be useful for deciding treatment strategy after ER.…”
Section: Risk-scoring System For Patients With Noncurative Resectionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[55][56][57][58][59][60][61] All studies showed that the OS in patients with no additional treatment (72.0% to 85.0%) was lower than that in patients with additional surgery (85.0% to 96.0%). 55,[57][58][59][60][61] However, this difference may be largely affected by a selection bias in the treatment strategy after ER because there is a discrepancy in the OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) between no additional treatment and additional surgery groups. In fact, the 5-year DSSs in patients with additional treatment and those with no additional treatment were 98.7% to 100% and 92.6% to 97.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Noncurative Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this category, until JGCA guidelines version 4, additional surgery was recommended for all patients as a result of the potential risk of LNM. However, the rate of LNM in such patients was only 5.2%–11.0% . Thus, this recommendation may have been excessive.…”
Section: Management After Er In Each Curability Categorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the rate of LNM in such patients was only 5.2%-11.0%. 38,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Thus, this recommendation may have been excessive. In the JGCA guidelines version 5, 13 the statement for the management of eCura C-2 was changed as follows: "Additional surgery is the standard treatment method, but clinicians should decide considering the patient's physical condition."…”
Section: Ecura C-2mentioning
confidence: 99%