2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term outcomes of patients treated with rituximab as second‐line treatment for adult immune thrombocytopenia – Follow‐up of the RITP study

Abstract: Summary RITP was a double‐blind randomized, 78‐week follow‐up trial in which 109 adults with immune thrombocytopenias (ITP) who failed to achieve adequate response to steroids, were randomized to receive rituximab or placebo. Here, we provide the duration of response, splenectomy and mortality rates based on extended follow‐up after completion of the RITP study. Extended follow‐up data were retrospectively collected for 72 (83%) patients out of the 84 patients who were not splenectomized during the initial RIT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[46][47][48][49] Despite the relapse rate, patients treated with rituximab had a longer duration of response compared with placebo (median 8.2 months vs 1.8 months). 50 Studies examining different dosages of rituximab, including a lower dose of 100 mg/week for four weeks 51 and a dose of 1000 mg on days 1 and 15 did not show significant differences in response rate or infection risks. 52,53 Rituximab has also been studied in combination with other therapies such as high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed ITP, with an initial strong overall response though sustained response after 12 months of follow up decreased to 61.5%, with an 11.1% incidence of adverse effects.…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[46][47][48][49] Despite the relapse rate, patients treated with rituximab had a longer duration of response compared with placebo (median 8.2 months vs 1.8 months). 50 Studies examining different dosages of rituximab, including a lower dose of 100 mg/week for four weeks 51 and a dose of 1000 mg on days 1 and 15 did not show significant differences in response rate or infection risks. 52,53 Rituximab has also been studied in combination with other therapies such as high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed ITP, with an initial strong overall response though sustained response after 12 months of follow up decreased to 61.5%, with an 11.1% incidence of adverse effects.…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this prototypic antibody-mediated autoimmune disease, B cell depletion using rituximab (anti-CD20 mAb) is widely used, with up to 60% of patients having a short-term complete response ( 15 ), 40% achieving durable responses (6–12 months), and only 20% to 30% achieving a long-term response (5 years; refs. 16 , 17 ). Paradoxically, B cell depletion therapy stimulates an adaptation of splenic short-lived plasma cells that leads to their reprogramming into long-lived spleen cells in patients with ITP, explaining in part primary failure of rituximab ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial in un-splenectomized adults with primary IT, rituximab, an anti-CD 20 antibody and off-label drug used to treat IT, did not reduce long-term treatment failure, and infections were significantly higher in the arm administered rituximab 7 . In a follow-up study, the relapse rate was high among rituximab-treated patients 8 . However, in our case, rituximab could not be used before ICH, which occurred in month 6 following the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%