2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcomes and Valve Performance in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses, when compared to surgical prostheses. [15][16][17][18][19] In addition, a costeffectiveness study showed a slight economic advantage for TAVI in the medium-term follow-up. 16 However, for younger patients (below 70 years), we still do not have consistent data for the durability of TAVI prostheses compared to surgical prostheses.…”
Section: Le Bihan Et Al Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses, when compared to surgical prostheses. [15][16][17][18][19] In addition, a costeffectiveness study showed a slight economic advantage for TAVI in the medium-term follow-up. 16 However, for younger patients (below 70 years), we still do not have consistent data for the durability of TAVI prostheses compared to surgical prostheses.…”
Section: Le Bihan Et Al Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando se trata do primeiro ponto, estudos preliminares mostraram desfechos semelhantes quanto à degeneração estrutural, tanto para as próteses balão expansíveis quanto para as autoexpansíveis, quando comparadas às próteses cirúrgicas. 15 - 19 Além disso, um estudo de custo efetividade mostrou discreta vantagem econômica para o TAVI, no acompanhamento em médio prazo. 16 Entretanto, para pacientes mais jovens (abaixo de 70 anos), ainda não temos dados consistentes para a durabilidade das próteses TAVI frente às cirúrgicas.…”
unclassified
“…Although long-term data on SVD in TAVI patients is scarce, there is evidence that there is a similar rate of SVD in surgical and TAVI patients at five years [ 73 ]. Registry data show low rates of SVD even after five years [ 74 , 75 ]. The NOTION trial—the first randomized trial on bioprosthetic valve durability in patients with low surgical risk of mortality—even showed a lower rate of SVD in TAVI compared to surgical patients at 8 years (13.9% vs. 28.3%; p = 0.0017) and the risk of bioprosthetic valve failure was similar (8.7% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.61) [ 76 ].…”
Section: Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as the primary treatment option for individuals with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with increased surgical risk, and is steadily gaining traction as a valid alternative to conventional surgery in lower-surgical-risk patients [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. The combination of considerable progress in transcatheter techniques and devices, along with the accumulating experience of operators have contributed to the minimization of periprocedural complications and have led to a dramatic improvement in TAVI short- and long-term outcomes [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Given the emerging expansion of indications for the minimally invasive, percutaneous repair of aortic stenosis, the challenge remains to identify those patients that are more likely to benefit from TAVI, as well as objective features that may be predictive of a less favorable prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%