2017
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcomes and Incidence of Recurrence of Neovascularization in Treated Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Abstract: The incidence of recurrence of treated NAMD decreases slowly but steadily during follow-up. The number of years of follow-up is the main factor to assess the proportion of treated eyes at remission at a given moment. Incidence of recurrence of neovascularization during year 1 and length of follow-up are significant factors when tailoring an optimal long-term follow-up regimen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was one of the few PRN studies that demonstrated an average final vision above baseline, although this was still not statistically significant [37]. Others, such as those by Gillies et al [38], Zhu et al [39], Haddad et al [40], the PACORES study group [41] and Westborg et al [42] recorded average visual losses from as little as −4.3 letters to as much as −25.4 letters from peak visual gains, when studied over the long term.…”
Section: Pro-re-nata (Prn) Dosingmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This was one of the few PRN studies that demonstrated an average final vision above baseline, although this was still not statistically significant [37]. Others, such as those by Gillies et al [38], Zhu et al [39], Haddad et al [40], the PACORES study group [41] and Westborg et al [42] recorded average visual losses from as little as −4.3 letters to as much as −25.4 letters from peak visual gains, when studied over the long term.…”
Section: Pro-re-nata (Prn) Dosingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although there is no long-term head-to-head comparison study between TAE/TES vs. PRN treatment methods in RCTs or private practice, a comparison of these outcomes individually reveals that the TAE/TES method is superior. RCTs, such as the CATT-5 and SEVEN-UP studies, along with many retrospective studies employing the PRN method beyond an average follow-up time of 3 years (up to 7 years) have demonstrated average visual changes of +1.4 to −19.3 letters from baseline vision [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Conversely, prospective and retrospective data have reported visual increases of 5-9.7 letters for similar time intervals in eyes managed by a TAE/TES strategy [43,49,50].…”
Section: Treat-and-extend (Tae) and Treat-extend-stop (Tes) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations