2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcomes and Associations With Major Adverse Limb Events After Peripheral Artery Revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 These therapies have proven benefit and are often underprescribed in the PAD population. 19,20 Of the patients with CKD in our study, 78.6%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 These therapies have proven benefit and are often underprescribed in the PAD population. 19,20 Of the patients with CKD in our study, 78.6%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These patients may benefit more from aggressive medical management with high‐intensity statins and/or PCSK9 inhibitors, more aggressive control of diabetes mellitus with GLP‐1 and/or SGLT2 inhibitors, and more aggressive antiplatelet or antithrombotic medications (including rivaroxaban as demonstrated in the COMPASS trial) 18 . These therapies have proven benefit and are often underprescribed in the PAD population 19,20 . Of the patients with CKD in our study, 78.6% were on aspirin, 82.5% on lipid lowering therapy, 69.0% on clopidogrel, and 65.3% on dual antiplatelet therapy post index procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These findings are corroborated by a recent study of US hospital discharge billing files conducted by Hess et al, which found that 12.9% of patients who underwent revascularization experienced a subsequent MALE, defined as a hospitalization for ALI, major limb amputation, or surgical peripheral revascularization. 15 Additionally, the study reported comparable, but lower incidence rates of major amputation (1.11-6.08/100 patient years), MI (1.32-1.40/100 patient years), and stroke (0.69-0.83/100 patient years) after revascularization. Of note, it is important to distinguish the different study design elements used by Hess et al, including limiting the outcomes to events occurring during inpatient and hospital-based outpatient visits, the definition of the MALE composite outcome, and the inclusion of patients covered under any type of insurance, which likely contributed to the differences in findings between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A recent study by Hess C and colleagues, using US hospital discharge billing files, reported that 12.9% of patients with PAD who underwent lower extremity revascularization experienced a subsequent major adverse limb events (MALE). 15 Another recent claims-based, real-world study among patients with chronic PAD conducted by Berger et al characterized the incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and MALE associated with PAD. 8 The incidence of MACE was estimated to be 5.32/100 person years, while the incidence of MALE was 7.44/100 person years, producing a combined MACE or MALE incidence rate of 12.16/100 person years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As PAD progresses, endovascular or surgical revascularization procedures may be required to improve symptoms and prevent tissue loss in severe cases [4], which in turn could improve patients' quality of life [9,10]. Despite improvements in clinical management for PAD, evidence suggests that patients undergoing revascularization may face increased risk of major atherothrombotic vascular events after the procedure, specifically ALI, MI, amputation, ischemic stroke, and CV-related death [11][12][13][14][15][16]. For example, in a post hoc analysis of the EUCLID randomized trial for treatment for PAD, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization had four times the risk of ALI and a 29% increased risk of MI compared to those enrolled based on other diagnostic metrics (all p<0.01) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%