1996
DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome of unilaterally transplanted parkinsonian patients

Abstract: Five patients with Parkinson's disease, unilaterally transplanted with foetal mesencephalic cells into putamen (n=1) or putamen and caudate (n=4), were followed throughout a period of 15-36 months after surgery, according to the recommendations of the core assessment programme for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT). All these patients exhibited an increase in the fluorodopa uptake in the grafted putamen, which was most significant in the first and last patient of the series. Long-term bilateral improvement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the fact that striatal cell transplantation can offer a substantial clinical benefit also in moderate to severe PD patients, as has been recently reported in an open label study (Mendez et al, 2005). It is also worth noting that these functional benefits were achieved with only unilateral striatal transplantation, in a bilateral PD primate model, similar to cases in clinical studies of fetal transplantation (Defer et al, 1996;Lindvall et al, 1994;Mendez et al, 2005;Piccini et al, 1999), unilateral striatal GDNF infusion (Slevin et al, 2007;Slevin et al, 2005), and DBS stimulation (Slowinski et al, 2007). In these previous reports, bilateral functional benefit included mild to moderate ipsilateral and axial improvements and a pronounced contralateral improvements (Bastian et al, 2003;Germano et al, 2004), although the magnitude of ipsilateral and axial changes was not studied in detail.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This highlights the fact that striatal cell transplantation can offer a substantial clinical benefit also in moderate to severe PD patients, as has been recently reported in an open label study (Mendez et al, 2005). It is also worth noting that these functional benefits were achieved with only unilateral striatal transplantation, in a bilateral PD primate model, similar to cases in clinical studies of fetal transplantation (Defer et al, 1996;Lindvall et al, 1994;Mendez et al, 2005;Piccini et al, 1999), unilateral striatal GDNF infusion (Slevin et al, 2007;Slevin et al, 2005), and DBS stimulation (Slowinski et al, 2007). In these previous reports, bilateral functional benefit included mild to moderate ipsilateral and axial improvements and a pronounced contralateral improvements (Bastian et al, 2003;Germano et al, 2004), although the magnitude of ipsilateral and axial changes was not studied in detail.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transplanted neuronal tissue in the past have generated little consensus about the need and the duration of immunosuppressant treatment. Post-graft immunosuppressive treatments have been extremely diverse, ranging from long-term classical triple therapy 10,11 to no treatment at all. 6 There is now a general consensus about a timely limited need for immunosuppressive regimens after intracerebral neural grafts comparable to those used in other cases of allotransplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been highly variable, with some patients showing a substantial recovery in motor function, and others showing little or no improvement. In open-label trials, a significant reduction in peak dose dyskinesias ("on" time with dyskinesias) has been reported in some patients, whereas in others the 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-L-alanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesias have been unaffected or increased (Widner et al, 1992;Defer et al, 1996;Hagell et al, 1999;Hauser et al, 1999;Brundin et al, 2000). These discrepancies have been suggested, at least in part, to be attributable to the differences in dissection and preparation of the fetal tissue, in which tissue clumps, tissue stripes, or single-cell suspensions have been used (Winkler et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%