2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome of High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Abstract: These long-term results confirm our previous observations regarding the safety of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Despite the application of high radiation doses, the incidence of rectal bleeding at 8 years was less than 2%. Despite the increased conformality of the dose distribution associated with intensity modulated radiation therapy, excellent long-term tumor control outcomes were achieved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
239
3
18

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
15
239
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-and 8-year prostate cancer recurrence free survival (PRFS) for those taking a statin medication were 89% (95% CI=85%-92%) and 80% (95% CI=72%-86%), compared with 83% (95% CI=81%-85%) and 74% (95% CI=71% (38,39). A reduction in metastatic spread has the potential to improve patient quality of life, and consequently, the therapeutic window in radiation therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-and 8-year prostate cancer recurrence free survival (PRFS) for those taking a statin medication were 89% (95% CI=85%-92%) and 80% (95% CI=72%-86%), compared with 83% (95% CI=81%-85%) and 74% (95% CI=71% (38,39). A reduction in metastatic spread has the potential to improve patient quality of life, and consequently, the therapeutic window in radiation therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent results from the largest study so far of 561 men with prostate cancer treated with 15 MV IMRT (dMLC) show that, to date, none of the men developed secondary cancers as a result of the radiation therapy, after a median follow-up period of seven years [48]. This review shows no consistent dose difference between MLC based IMRT and conventional radiotherapy in the non-target tissue ( Figure 5), nor in the whole body dose (Figures 9 and 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation techniques used for EBRT 10 and brachytherapy 11,12 have been previously described in detail. Briefly, patients treated with EBRT received a dose of 81 to 86.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions using 15-MV photons.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%