“…Another advantage of endarterectomy in general, including eversion endarterectomy, is a possibility to maintain better sexual potency, because it allows avoiding preparation of the aortic walls and common iliac arteries. The group of patients who would potentially benefit better from endarterectomy rather than bypass in aortoiliac segment includes the patients with atherosclerotic lesions not extending to common iliac arteries, the male patients who, apart from ischae mia of lower limbs, suffer also from erection disorders and diagnosed atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of an internal iliac artery, the patients with atherosclerotic occlusion of external iliac arteries with considerable risk of infections after bypass procedures or for whom, due to their narrow blood vessels, bypass is technically difficult, the patients with "localized" atherosclerotic lesions, and last but not least, the patients with bifur cated graft with endtoside anastomosis who need to have the prosthesis removed due to infection -in such cases the authors of this paper suggest endarterectomy as one of the alternative "rescue" solutions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Currently, the value of direct aortoiliac endarterecto my has been reminded by Connoly and Price [12], and yet, they raise a question in the title of their paperwhether aortoiliac endarterectomy is a lost art.…”