2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcome after surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma and prognostic index value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cholangiocarcinoma, there are a few publications citing margin status as a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis . A systematic review of ICC did not include margin status among significant prognostic factors .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cholangiocarcinoma, there are a few publications citing margin status as a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis . A systematic review of ICC did not include margin status among significant prognostic factors .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to offer a better chance to receive a tailored treatment after resection and to improve the long term outcomes of these patients, the Chinese authors created a formula in which they introduced the number of lymph node metastases, the serum levels of CEA and the surgical margins, these three parameters being the most significant ones in multivariate analysis for survival (15). These parameters were quoted with 1 point if the resection margin was positive, if the lymph nodes presented metastases and if the serum level of CEA was higher than 15 ng/ml, and 2 points if the resection margin was negative, if the lymph nodes did not present metastatic disease and if the serum levels were lower than 15 ng/ml.…”
Section: The Impact Of Lymph Node Metastases After Resection With Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were quoted with 1 point if the resection margin was positive, if the lymph nodes presented metastases and if the serum level of CEA was higher than 15 ng/ml, and 2 points if the resection margin was negative, if the lymph nodes did not present metastatic disease and if the serum levels were lower than 15 ng/ml. According to the value of this score, the 169 cases introduced in this study were classified in three categories -high risk, middle risk and low risk, the three categories reporting a significant difference in terms of survival (15).…”
Section: The Impact Of Lymph Node Metastases After Resection With Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 16 Margin status significantly affected survival, where a positive margin (R1 resection) remained a negative prognostic factor for ICC patients. 17 , 18 Moreover, several studies suggested a survival advantage for negative margins of 1.0 cm or more (wide margin) compared to negative margins of <1.0 cm (narrow margin). 19 21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%