2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome after Successful Lower Extremity Free Flap Salvage

Abstract: Background Vascular occlusion after free flap surgery has become a rare complication but still poses a major challenge. It necessitates urgent re-exploration, but the logistic challenge to provide sufficient resources for the emergency intervention remains. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcome after successful lower extremity free flap salvage. Methods A single-center retrospective study including long-term follow-up was approved by the local ethics committee. From January 199… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Free flap complication rates are higher in lower extremity reconstruction compared with other recipient sites (Culliford IV et al, 2007). We recently reviewed our experience with 581 lower extremity free flap reconstructions over an 11-year period and found a re-exploration rate of 15% and a flap loss rate of 5% (Bigdeli et al, 2019), which is in line with the literature (Disa, Pusic, Hidalgo, & Cordeiro, 2001;Ho et al, 2012). Regarding the postoperative course of the CPLD free flaps, we found a re-exploration rate of 13% for microvascular complications and a flap loss rate of 5% and thus comparable to single-flap procedures (Bigdeli et al, 2019;Disa et al, 2001;Ho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Free flap complication rates are higher in lower extremity reconstruction compared with other recipient sites (Culliford IV et al, 2007). We recently reviewed our experience with 581 lower extremity free flap reconstructions over an 11-year period and found a re-exploration rate of 15% and a flap loss rate of 5% (Bigdeli et al, 2019), which is in line with the literature (Disa, Pusic, Hidalgo, & Cordeiro, 2001;Ho et al, 2012). Regarding the postoperative course of the CPLD free flaps, we found a re-exploration rate of 13% for microvascular complications and a flap loss rate of 5% and thus comparable to single-flap procedures (Bigdeli et al, 2019;Disa et al, 2001;Ho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We recently reviewed our experience with 581 lower extremity free flap reconstructions over an 11-year period and found a re-exploration rate of 15% and a flap loss rate of 5% (Bigdeli et al, 2019), which is in line with the literature (Disa, Pusic, Hidalgo, & Cordeiro, 2001;Ho et al, 2012). Regarding the postoperative course of the CPLD free flaps, we found a re-exploration rate of 13% for microvascular complications and a flap loss rate of 5% and thus comparable to single-flap procedures (Bigdeli et al, 2019;Disa et al, 2001;Ho et al, 2012). Thus, transfer of the CPLD free flap may even reduce the risk of microvascular complications, when compared to transferring two individual free flaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flap choice does not seem to make much difference in long-term outcome. 7,9,17,18 Most studies would agree that the deciding factor in outcome is the severity of the injury rather than the choices made in reconstruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei einer lappenplastischen Rekonstruktion im Extremitätenbe reich handelt es sich mittlerweile um ein sicheres mikrochirurgi sches Verfahren mit einer Lappenplastiküberlebensrate zwischen 94 % und 99 % [16,17]. In der Literatur zeigt sich zentrumsabhängig bei freien lappenplastischen Deckungen an der unteren Extremität eine Revisionsrate von ca.…”
Section: Revision In Der Extremitätenrekonstruktionunclassified
“…Von diesen 15 % revidierten Lappen plastiken konnten wiederum 76 % durch eine Revisionsoperation erhalten werden. 67 % der Revision fanden in den ersten 24 Stun den, 21 % zwischen 24 und 72 Stunden postoperativ und 12 % spä ter statt [17]. In den meisten Fällen handelte es sich um eine ve nöse Thrombose, gefolgt von Hämatom oder Blutungen.…”
Section: Revision In Der Extremitätenrekonstruktionunclassified