2004
DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.15.1862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Outcome After Intravenous Thrombolysis of Basilar Artery Occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

12
140
1
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
12
140
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent placement have decreased BAO mortality to 30%-65%. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Fewer data are available for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), [13][14][15] but a recent meta-analysis showed no significant difference in outcome between IVT and IAT, despite higher recanalization rates with IAT. 11 To our knowledge, no randomized study comparing IVT and IAT is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent placement have decreased BAO mortality to 30%-65%. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Fewer data are available for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), [13][14][15] but a recent meta-analysis showed no significant difference in outcome between IVT and IAT, despite higher recanalization rates with IAT. 11 To our knowledge, no randomized study comparing IVT and IAT is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of well-balanced comparative studies of the literature-based outcomes or a large prospective randomized trial has led to a different view on the preferred therapy, that is, IVT or IAT. Lindsberg et al 17 reported a 52% recanalization rate after IV rtPA in patients with BAO. However, several series have reported rates of recanalization with IAT that were thought to be higher than that for IVT 4,[14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Las oclusiones de la arteria basilar, de muy mal pronóstico, clásicamente eran tratadas con abordaje intraarterial; sin embargo, hay estudios que muestran un beneficio de la trombolisis intravenosa, tanto en las tres primeras horas como en las siguientes. Lindsberg y col concluyen en sus trabajos 36,37 que en estos casos el rTPA iv tiene unas cifras de supervivencia, recanalización y evolución funcional independiente comparables con los resultados de técnicas endovasculares. Las ventanas terapéuticas utilizadas por este grupo son de hasta 24-48 horas sugiriendo que, además de que son pacientes cuyo pronóstico ominoso sin tratamiento fuerza a los profesionales a individualizar sus decisiones, hay datos para hipotetizar que la resistencia del tejido a la oclusión de estas arterias y al tiempo en penumbra isquémica puede ser mayor 38 , probablemente debido a los patrones de circulación colateral que se desarrollan.…”
Section: Expansión De La Ventana Terapéutica: Más Allá De Las 3 Horasunclassified