Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2012.755260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term organic nutrient managements foster the biological properties and carbon sequestering capability of a wetland rice soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…computed using these six biological indicators. Based on the literature and our previous works (Balachandar et al, 2016;Chinnadurai et al, 2013;Chinnadurai et al, 2014;Preethi et al, 2012;Tamilselvi et al, 2015), it is obvious that these biological variables were significantly altered by the nutrient management adoptions. All these bio-indicators were reported highest in OM and INM, whereas the IC and control recorded on par values or sometimes IC was higher than control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…computed using these six biological indicators. Based on the literature and our previous works (Balachandar et al, 2016;Chinnadurai et al, 2013;Chinnadurai et al, 2014;Preethi et al, 2012;Tamilselvi et al, 2015), it is obvious that these biological variables were significantly altered by the nutrient management adoptions. All these bio-indicators were reported highest in OM and INM, whereas the IC and control recorded on par values or sometimes IC was higher than control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With this background, we have used six important biological attributes of the soil, selected based on our previous works (Balachandar et al, 2016;Chinnadurai et al, 2013;Chinnadurai et al, 2014;Tamilselvi et al, 2015;Preethi et al, 2012) such as soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, labile carbon, protein index, dehydrogenase activity and substrate-induced respiration as soil biological quality indicators. The https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2019-60 Preprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured these six variables from four long-term nutrient management adopted soils (control, inorganic fertilizer-applied, organic manure amended, and integrated nutrient management adopted). Based on the literature and our previous works, the continuous use of organic and inorganic nutrient amendments could significantly alter the above mentioned biological attributes and largely SOC (Preethi et al, 2012;Chinnadurai et al, 2013;Balachandar et al, 2014;Chinnadurai et al, 2014;Tamilselvi et al, 2015;Balachandar et al, 2016). All these biological attributes were reported highest in INM and OM, whereas the IC and control recorded on par values or sometimes IC was higher than control.…”
Section: Soil Biological Attributes and Soil Biological Quality Indexmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the soil quality index should link the scientific knowledge and agricultural and land management practices to assess sustainability (Romig et al, 1995). Most of the SQIs place more importance on the physical (soil aggregation, water retention) and chemical indicators (carbon dynamics and nutrient-carrying capacity), with less importance given to biological attributes (microbial biomass carbon, arthropods) (Biswas et al, 2017;Calero et al, 2018;Menta et al, 2018;Pulido et al, 2017;Schmidt et al, 2018). To emphasize the biological and biochemical attributes in soil quality, the biological quality of soil (BSQ) was first proposed by Parisi (2001), which was used to measure the bioindicators of soil, especially the arthropods of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%