2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term operation of a pilot scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
57
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
14
57
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Low temperature might increase the wastewater viscosity, slow down the rate of biological reaction, and decrease COD removal efficiency. Compared to the previous study with elastic fiber carriers in two-stage anaerobic filter for domestic wastewater treatment [12], the COD removal efficiency in this study was better, which may be because the wool felt carrier enhanced the agglomeration of the microbial community in the AWFR system. Overall, the performance of the AWFR system was relatively stable and the COD removal efficiency was higher in summer than in winter.…”
Section: Cod Removalcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low temperature might increase the wastewater viscosity, slow down the rate of biological reaction, and decrease COD removal efficiency. Compared to the previous study with elastic fiber carriers in two-stage anaerobic filter for domestic wastewater treatment [12], the COD removal efficiency in this study was better, which may be because the wool felt carrier enhanced the agglomeration of the microbial community in the AWFR system. Overall, the performance of the AWFR system was relatively stable and the COD removal efficiency was higher in summer than in winter.…”
Section: Cod Removalcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) [8,9], anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) [10], and anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) [7,11,12] are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater. Despite the effective chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal by these anaerobic biotechnologies, some challenges still exist, such as complex three-phase separator and long solids' retention time of UASB, membrane fouling and high energy costs of AnMBR, and high land footprint of ABR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of the reactor or the degree of mixing, the placement of the membrane inside the reactor or inside an external tank could contribute in different ways to the fouling of the membrane, and therefore to the different energy consumption in long-term maintenance. In a previous study, Gouveia et al (2015), operating a pilot scale AnMBR with a submerged membrane located in an external tank connected to the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB), observed an accumulation of solids at the bottom of the membrane module. This suspension showed poor flow ability and sedimentability characteristics, impeding its recirculation to the UASB reactor, thus preventing adequate contact with the active biomass and consequently its possible biodegradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since many wastewaters have characteristics that may limit the stable formation of microbial aggregates, AnMBRs also have great potential for the treatment of extreme organic wastewaters or slurries where the conventional granular sludge bed systems fail to retain highly active anaerobic biomass in the reactors (Van Lier et al, 2001). Recently, AnMBRs have been utilized to treat real industrial wastewaters in some researches, and the investigations about their dynamics, performance, stability and membrane fouling show that the anaerobic biotechnology has a good application prospect (Shin et al, 2014;Gouveia et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2013). Nevertheless, since the complexity, interaction and impact of various organic and inorganic compounds present in different real wastewaters, the availability and performance of AnMBRs still requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%