2020
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term neural regeneration following injury to the peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve in sheep

Abstract: Peripheral nerves (PNs) are frequently injured as a result of trauma or disease. Development of therapies to regenerate PNs requires the use of animal models, typically beginning in rodents and progressing to larger species. There are several large animal models of PN regeneration that each has their benefits and drawbacks. Sheep have been used in PN studies due to their similarities in body weight to humans and the ease and lesser expense in their care and housing relative to other species. We have investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, considering the decrease in the diameter of the nerve in more distal positions, the internal diameter of the NGC used would be too large to allow a correct accommodation and suture of the nerve inside it and would make it difficult to accommodate the NGC between the muscles. The third initially considered surgical technique was also promptly disregarded due to the technical difficulties associated with its performance, even considering that this technique has already been used in other works [53]: Not only would the caudal access require great mobilization and trauma for the separation of the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles, but the exposure of the nerve would be minimal, hampering the performance of the nerve damage through the surgical window between the musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, considering the decrease in the diameter of the nerve in more distal positions, the internal diameter of the NGC used would be too large to allow a correct accommodation and suture of the nerve inside it and would make it difficult to accommodate the NGC between the muscles. The third initially considered surgical technique was also promptly disregarded due to the technical difficulties associated with its performance, even considering that this technique has already been used in other works [53]: Not only would the caudal access require great mobilization and trauma for the separation of the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles, but the exposure of the nerve would be minimal, hampering the performance of the nerve damage through the surgical window between the musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nerve is the most commonly affected in injuries involving the lower limb in humans [ 41 , 43 ]. Moreover, it is adequate because it is similar in size and plurifasciular, as is the human peroneal nerve, and induces a limited motor deficit that still allows the animals to stand and walk [ 20 , 44 ]. Since the common peroneal nerve is a mixed nerve, both motor and sensory functional loss in the denervated targets is expected [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, considering the decrease in the diameter of the nerve in more distal positions, the internal diameter of the NGC used would be too large to allow a correct accommodation and suture of the nerve inside it and would make it difficult to accommodate the NGC between the muscles. The third initially considered surgical technique was also promptly disregarded due to the technical difficulties associated with its performance, even considering that this technique has already been used in other works (72): not only would the caudal access require great mobilization and trauma for the separation of the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles, but the exposure of the nerve would be minimal, hampering the performance of the nerve damage through the surgical window between the musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%