The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2022.102687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term multi-wavelength study of temporal and spectral properties of 3C 279

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results in Table 1 indicate that a log-parabola model is enough to fit the spectra and no significant cut-off at GeV energies is observed during the flaring state, suggesting the dissipation region is outside the BLR and the energy dissipation may be due to the IC process of scattering the DT infrared photons. This result is consistent with the one suggested by Tolamatti et al (2022).…”
Section: The Location Of the Dissipation Regionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results in Table 1 indicate that a log-parabola model is enough to fit the spectra and no significant cut-off at GeV energies is observed during the flaring state, suggesting the dissipation region is outside the BLR and the energy dissipation may be due to the IC process of scattering the DT infrared photons. This result is consistent with the one suggested by Tolamatti et al (2022).…”
Section: The Location Of the Dissipation Regionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Shukla & Mannheim (2020) analyzed the minute timescale peak-in-peak variability and proposed that the particle acceleration is due to relativistic magnetic reconnection. However, the magnetic reconnection mechanism for the particle acceleration has been questioned for the reason of a low magnetization (Hu et al 2020(Hu et al , 2021Tolamatti et al 2022), and the shock-in-jet model for the particle acceleration is considered for the 2018 flare (Tolamatti et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the sharp peak profiles, we notice 4FGL J0303.4-2407 and 4FGL J0739.2+0137 show fast-rising and slowly decaying subflares. This asymmetry can be related to the particle acceleration mechanism in the jet, a fast rise could result from an effective particle acceleration at the shock front and slow decay may be interpreted as the weakening of the shock (Sokolov et al 2004;Tolamatti et al 2022) or from the injection of energetic particles on a shorter timescale than the cooling process timescales (Acharyya et al 2021). 4FGL J1751.5+0938 shows a slowly rising and fast-decaying subflare, which may be associated with an efficient cooling process.…”
Section: Connection With the Tev Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these observations, significant progress has been made in blazar studies, e.g., the classification that depends on the synchrotron peak frequency (Abdo et al 2010a;Fan et al 2016;Yang et al 2022), the blazar sequence (Fan et al 2017;Ghisellini et al 2017;Ouyang et al 2023), and the blazar central engine (Paliya et al 2021;Xiao et al 2022a). More studies focus on individual sources, study the properties of flares or outbursts, and put constraints on the blazar emission mechanism, such as the flare of 3C 279 (Shukla & Mannheim 2020;Wang et al 2022a;Tolamatti et al 2022), the neutrino TXS 0506+056 (IceCube Collaboration et al 2018b), variability and spectral properties for 3C 279, Ton 599, and PKS 1222+216 (Adams et al 2022), and the light-curve study of PKS 1510+089 (Prince et al 2017) to obtain information on blazar emission variability, periodicity, and spectrum. Long-coverage observations on different timescales and spectral analysis can be carried out by taking advantage of the all-sky monitoring capabilities of Fermi-LAT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability timescales shed lights on the emission size and even constrain the central black hole masses. Many TBLs are detected during their flare state of the γ-ray (Punch et al 1992;Quinn et al 1996;Catanese et al 1998;Chadwick et al 1999;Shukla & Mannheim 2020;Tolamatti et al 2022;Wang et al 2022). The variability in different wavelength can be used to investigate the emission mechanism.…”
Section: Luminosity Versus Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%